Deeper Honesty (Resumen)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ever Deeper Honesty How to reduce, prevent, eliminate suffering, and get ever-deeper freedom, peace, love, bliss, and “That”. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This book should be read in a pdf format. -- It’s free to read online (or download), from the main website: everdeeperhonesty.com -------------------- To deter people from trying to censor this book, (and, or website), this book can also be downloaded (legally, and for free), from these decentralised sources: -- archive.org, details, ever-deeper-honesty (This source only has the old version of the book.) -- Download a free app, called “BitTorrent Sync” (getsync.com), and then use this secret, key: BI4SQVUKBFPWEYJCIOBZI3EN73ZJ2XJPE (It’s available on all mobile devices, and desktops.) Or, click this link, follow instructions to install the app, and it will give you the book. https:, , link.getsync.com, #f=ever-deeper-honesty&sz=0&t=1&s=Q52GDELDNVON2PNPYMBUQSSY6YT4LOMK&i=CB3TL52SCH7IYOK2L7WMOLYXB6NIWGQUT&v=2.3 -------------------- If there are any problems with the main website, or minor errors in the book (eg: spelling errors, typos, formatting, etc), then please email: everdeeperhonesty@outlook.com -- BitTorrent Sync, and everdeeperhonesty.com, will have the latest version (of corrections). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This book is split into 2 parts: Part 1: Conclusion (One sentence) -- page 2 Conclusion (Short) -- page 3 Summary -- page 40 Conclusion (Long) -- page 54 Note: You only need to read the first 45 pages of this book. -- That will be good enough, to help you reduce, prevent, eliminate suffering, and get ever-deeper freedom, peace, love, bliss, and “That”. However, if you want to speed up this process, then read the long conclusion. You can totally ignore the rest of the book. -- Ie, you do not need to read part 2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Part 2: The rest of the book -- page 595 to 1193 Part 1 is infinitely better than part 2. Part 2 expands on things in part 1, and therefore part 2 is an 80% overlap, repeated repetitive version of part 1. And, part 2 is missing many important things, which are in part 1. And part 2 is not finished very well (does not flow very well) in certain places. I only included part 2, because it can be of extra help to certain people, (I’ll explain this more, on the first page of part 2). Note: Part 1 needs to be read before part 2, because it contains definitions of certain words, terms, phrases, concepts, which are used in the rest of the book. Similarly, part 1 should be read in a linear way, because it introduces certain words, terms, phrases, concepts, in a progressive way. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Caution: This book has the potential to shatter all your delusions about life. If you want to avoid this possibility, then do not read it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This book can be copied and distributed (in part, or whole), without permission, as long as it remains unaltered, and you mention the title of the book, and the website address, and it's kept free of charge. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Part 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Conclusion (one sentence) There is no freedom, choice, option of an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way out of life (and existence), therefore, life (and existence) is prison, torture, slavery, rape, and therefore, life (and existence) is survival of the stupidest. -------------------------------------------------- 2Note: This book explains many realisations, conclusions, and solutions (including practical ones, which are applicable to all aspects of life, and all levels of life), and these will all be detailed in the conclusion. However, if all of it had to be condensed into one sentence, then that sentence would be the one above. I have deliberately avoided using a very short sentence, because when the sentence, phrase is too short, there is the risk that it can be misunderstood, or it just becomes too: vague, ambiguous, meaningless, useless in practical life, etc. There were many alternative sentences that I could have used, (as will becomes apparent when you read the short conclusion), however, this sentence was perhaps the best general, overall one, because it’s good for all aspects of life, (and all levels of life, existence), and it also acts as a good pointer, (ie, it can send you ever-deeper). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Conclusion (short) Note: The terminology, phrases, ideas, information that is said in the first three pages of this conclusion, will make much more sense, after you have finished reading the whole of this short conclusion. -- This is especially true, in terms of saying that this information is not opinion, and is therefore indisputable, and inescapable. -- So, bear with me, for these next three pages. There are only two types of people, society, (type A, and type B). These can be summed up as follows. Type A people, society: These people, societies, understand that everyone must be provided with the most fundamental of rights, which is: The freedom, choice, option, to move away from suffering, in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way, whenever they want. This is obvious, because if you do not have the right, freedom to move away from suffering, then it would be legal for anyone to kidnap you, and then imprison you in a basement, where you are then raped and tortured on a daily basis, for the rest of your entire life. Ie, in that basement, you would be going through intolerable pain, suffering, but you have no right to demand that you be allowed to leave that situation of suffering. Ie, the perpetrator is legally allowed to do anything that they want to you, for the rest of 3your entire life. And therefore, it’s obvious, that this right, freedom must exist in all aspects of life, and at all levels of life, existence. And, obviously, it must also be preventative. Therefore, the two main priorities of these people, societies, must be to: 1. Make sure that all people, entities, have the freedom, choice, option, to leave any situation of suffering (including life, existence itself), in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way, whenever they want. 2. Not create new babies, entities, because they know that: a) Any baby that is brought into existence, will suffer regularly, throughout it’s entire lifetime. -- Ie, they know that they need to be preventative (of creating situations of suffering), and since life is inherently prison, torture, slavery, rape (suffering) from the moment that a baby is born, they know that it would be extremely immoral to bring a baby into existence. Indeed, it’s obvious that it would be extremely immoral to do this, because this would cause suffering, and they know that suffering is unacceptable and unnecessary. Note: The only people who are not able to truly recognise, admit this (that suffering is unacceptable and unnecessary), are all the selfish, immoral people, because they need to keep (directly and indirectly) brainwashing, programming themselves (and everyone), to believe that suffering is acceptable and necessary, because: (a) They have to do this, because it’s one of the main ways, of keeping people trapped, enslaved, (as their personal-slaves, and, or work-slaves). (b) They have to do this, to hide their selfish, immoral actions, of controlling, manipulating, using, enslaving people, (babies, children, adults), as their personal-slaves, and, or work-slaves. (I will define “personal-slaves” and “work-slaves”, later in this short conclusion.) -------------------- Note: I say that their actions are “selfish, immoral”, because this is obvious (and indisputable), because they are directly causing suffering to people (their personal-slaves, (and, or workslaves)), and in most cases, that suffering will 4occur regularly, for an entire lifetime, (eg, when they bring a baby into existence). Note: This book uses terms like “bad”, “wrong”, and “selfish, immoral, cruel, evil”, because these terms can be real, true, objective, fact (and fair, equal, neutral, and not opinion-based, nor based on some agenda), if they’re all naturally derived from: “The neutral, natural, true start-point (for everything)”. -- I’ll explain this in detail, in the summary. b) A baby cannot consent to be born, and therefore, the act of having a baby, is non-consensual, (and therefore rape). -- Also, the type A people, society know, that if one non-consensual act is allowed to happen, then many non-consensual acts will start to happen, and this means that suffering will then spread to everyone. -------------------- Type B people, society: These people, societies, are selfish, immoral, because they only care about trying to use, enslave all people (and entities), as their personal-slaves (and, or work-slaves), and therefore, they do all that they can, to make sure that no one is provided, with the most fundamental of rights, (the freedom, choice, option, to move away from suffering, in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way, whenever they want). And therefore, they try to restrict this freedom, in all aspects of life, and at all levels of life, existence. Therefore, the two main priorities of these people, societies, are to: 1. Make sure that no one has the freedom, choice, option, to leave life, existence, in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way, (whenever they want). -- And to ensure this, they will invent, create, implement (and enforce), many rules, beliefs, systems (legal, moral, social, interpersonal, personal, religious, spiritual, etc), in all aspects of life, which prevents this from happening. 2. Encourage, pressure, coerce, condition, brainwash, program everyone, to do things that will (directly or indirectly) create new babies, entities, because they know that: a) As soon as a person has a baby, that person is then part of the crime, and therefore that person will then have to constantly brainwash, program themselves (and everyone), to believe that: • Having a baby is good, moral, selfless, important, etc. • Having a baby will bring you happiness, joy, love, etc. • Suffering is acceptable, important, good, necessary, etc. • Suffering is part of life, (and therefore you, we, everyone, 5must just accept it). • Using, enslaving people (as personal-slaves, and, or work-slaves), is something that is acceptable, important, good, necessary, etc. • Etc. -------------------- Note: The aim of brainwashing, programming, is to be able to make people so blind, that whilst they're looking at a black object (eg, suffering), you'll be able to tell them, that it's actually white, and they'll believe you, (rather than their direct experience (of suffering)). This is vital, because only when you can control them on this level, can you make them believe that: (a) They're not suffering, (even whilst they're having the direct experience of suffering). -- And this means that you can continue to use them as your personal-slave, (and, or work-slave). Or, (b) They are suffering, but they chose it, (and, or want it, and, or need it), for reasons x, y, z. -- And this means that you can continue to use them as your personal-slave, (and, or work-slave). b) If new babies, entities are not created, then there will not be enough people to use as slaves, (personal-slaves, and, or work-slaves), and this will make life (for the type B people) harder, and, or not as enjoyable, and, or it will totally collapse their family, community, society, country, or whatever else. Ie, these things are the desires and fears, of the type B people, societies. And therefore, it is from these selfish desires and fears, that all their actions will be based. And therefore, all actions from all type B people, societies, will always be inherently selfish and immoral. -- And therefore, there will always be suffering. -------------------- Note: There is no middle ground (between the type A, and type B people, societies), because all people either have this most fundamental of rights, freedoms, or they don't. And, if they don't have this most fundamental of rights, freedoms, (ie, the freedom, choice, option, to move away from suffering, in an 6instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way, whenever they want), then they don't have any real, true freedom, which must inherently mean, that they're in a life which is inherently prison, torture, slavery, rape, (whether: physical, mental, emotional, or spiritual). ---------- Note: Although the type A people, society, will do these things (as explained above), to reduce, prevent, eliminate suffering, it's not a hardship, (nor something that they do unwillingly), because it's just something that they naturally do, because they just naturally do not want to cause suffering, to any person, entity, being, dimension, anything. Ie, the type A people, society, aren't trying to be moral (or whatever else), they just simply don't want any person, thing to suffer. -------------------- However, the information above (about reducing, preventing, eliminating suffering), is only one part of the story. -- Indeed, it can only be one part of the story, because life has three key, fundamental parts (desires) to it, which are to: 1. Permanently reduce, prevent, eliminate suffering. And, 2. Get ever-deeper freedom, peace, love, bliss. And, 3. Get “That” (which is beyond happiness, pleasure, joy, ecstasy, etc, and beyond freedom, peace, love, bliss, and beyond all divine, godly, religious, spiritual experiences, and beyond: truth, identity, enlightenment, god, experience, self-realisation, etc). In this book, I will use the word “That”, but some other people might call it: 'It', 'Home', 'Source', 'Truth', etc. -- Note: I will talk about how to get “That”, (or be as “That”), but the use of these words, terms (eg, “get”, “be as”, etc), are all incorrect, however, they will have to do. Note: The type A people, societies, will want to make sure that all people, entities, things in existence, get these three things (in points 1 to 3 (above)). There is one key fact about these three fundamental desires in life, and this will become obvious, when a person is able to clearly, honestly look at everything in life, existence. -- To see everything clearly, honestly, all you need to do, is to see everything from “The neutral, natural, true start-point (for everything)”, (as will be explained in the summary of this book)). -- Ie, by doing this, a person is not looking at everything in life, in a skewed, biased, deluded, filtered way, due to their selfish desires, fears, delusions. So when this is done, the one key fact about these three fundamental desires in life, (which becomes obvious), is that all three of these things, are pointing in the same 7direction, and towards the same conclusion, thing. And what this means, is that no matter what aspect of life (or level of life) you start with, if you examine it with ever-deeper honesty, there will be many superficial conclusions, realisations (which I will detail in the long conclusion), and they will all be pointing in the same direction, towards the same fundamental conclusion, thing. An example of two of these superficial conclusions, realisations, are: A) All types of society, life, existence, are only in existence, for selfish (malevolent) reasons, purposes. B) The less that you cling to people, things in existence, the more freedom, peace, love, bliss you will have (in the long-term). And, these two superficial conclusions, realisations, (like all the other conclusions, realisations), are all pointing in the same direction, towards the same fundamental conclusion, thing, which is that: All things in life, are directing everyone, towards “That”. Of course, this is to be expected, since “That”, is something that solves the first two fundamental desires in life, (as explained in points 1 and 2 (above)), because “That” is something which: 1. Has (is) zero suffering. And, 2. Is beyond freedom, peace, love, bliss. Ie, what this all means, is that the only true freedom, peace, love, bliss, is in (as) “That”. Of course, this is to be expected, because “That”, is something which is beyond all people, things, experiences, feelings, sensations in existence, and beyond freedom, peace, love, bliss, and beyond existence itself. Ie, earlier in this conclusion, instead of saying that “life has three key, fundamental parts (desires) to it, which are...”, I could have just said that: Life has one key, fundamental part (desire) to it, which is the desire for “That”. ---------------------------------------- Indeed, this is all obvious, however, the key thing that most people are blind to, (because they've blinded themselves to it), is the fact that: 8This thing called “That”, is non-existence. Note: Non-existence, is what remains, in the absence of everything, (including: awareness, consciousness, “i”, “I”, dimensions, realms, existence, etc). -- Therefore, non-existence is not a state-of-being, where you are aware of the void, nothingness, etc, (since awareness cannot exist in non-existence). -- Indeed, non-existence is not a state-of-being of any kind, since it is beyond all of this, and it's also beyond: enlightenment, awakening, self-realisation, liberation, non-duality, etc. -- Indeed, it's so far beyond all of these games, nonsense, that it can't be compared to any of it. Note: The reason why the word “That” is in quotes, is because it’s not a ‘thing’ that exists, (and indeed, it can’t exist, since: “That” is that which remains, in the absence of all things). -- The key point that I’m trying to emphasise, is that the word “That”, is in quotes, purely for this reason, and not for any other reason. Ie, it’s not in quotes, because it’s some mystical thing which no words can describe. Yes, it’s true (in a sense), that no words can describe it, however, this is only because it is not some ‘thing’ that exists. However, this thing called “That”, is not a mystery, since we do know what it is, (since “That” is the absence of all things, (which is the same as non-existence)). And, yes, it’s true (in a sense), that this thing called “That”, is something that cannot be attained, however, this is not because it is some thing (or some state-of-being) which is: mystical, illusive, hard to attain, etc. Ie, the only reason why it “cannot be attained”, is because to “attain” something, you (as a person) need to exist. And, “That”, can only exist, in the absence of all things, (which therefore also includes you, as a person, or as any other identity, eg: consciousness, awareness, oneness, nothingness, everything, existence, non-existence, “That”, etc). Note: That last sentence did also include non-existence, and “That”. Ie, yes, it is true, that when you strip away all the superficial (and deep) layers of a person, then what will remain, is “That” (non-existence), however, it’s ridiculous to say, “I am ‘That’”, because you cannot exist in “That”, nor as “That”. -- However, “That” can ‘exist’ by itself, (as non-existence). So, for all these reasons (which I have just explained), it does still make sense to put the word “That” in quotes, however, just remember, that the quotes are not there, to say that “That” is something which you truly are, (or whatever other similar attempt to claim a new identity), nor are the quotes there, to state that this thing is a mystery, (or: mystical, spiritual, divine, etc). Indeed, it’s totally the opposite, since there is nothing simpler, than non-existence. ---------- Note: There are many reasons why people are blind to this fact (that this thing called “That”, is non-existence), and I'll explain all of them, in the long conclusion. -- And I'll also explain, why it's obvious, that this thing called “That”, is non-existence. 9And I'll also show how so many other things, then also become obvious. Eg, it's obvious that, “All types of society, life, existence, are only in existence, for selfish (malevolent) reasons, purposes”, because, if you wanted the ultimate freedom, peace, love, bliss, you wouldn't create babies, entities, life, existence, because the ultimate freedom, peace, love, bliss, only exists in (as) “That”, (non-existence). -------------------- Note: Although some of this information (eg, the sentence, “All types of society, life, existence, are only in existence, for selfish (malevolent) reasons, purposes”), might sound too unrelatable, irrelevant (in terms of reducing, preventing, eliminating suffering in normal everyday life), it’s actually all totally relevant, because it's actually this exact same issue, that is causing all the suffering in everyone's normal everyday life, because: 1. People are only staying in life, existence, for selfish (malevolent) reasons, purposes. And, 2. People are only creating babies, entities in life, existence, for selfish (malevolent) reasons, purposes. These selfish (malevolent) reasons, purposes, are to use, enslave these newly created babies, children (and future adults), as personal-slaves, and, or work-slaves. The definitions of these, are as follows: a) Personal-slaves. Personal-slaves are babies, children, adults, which are used, enslaved, not for work purposes, reasons, but for personal reasons, uses. Ie, if you have a relationship partner, (or: friend, baby, child, family, etc), then they are your personal-slaves, because you're trying to get, control, manipulate, use (enslave) a person, (whether that person is a baby, child, adult), in order to get things from them, (eg: happiness, love, money, entertainment, energy, attention, power, respect, sex, pleasure, affection, intimacy, a connection, popularity, image, identity, certain feelings, security, safety, stability, survival, peace, freedom, a family, a child, experiences, sensations, etc). Note: People only decide to have babies (and relationships, friendships, families, etc), because they want some (or many) of these things. b) Direct work-slaves. If you are using, enslaving a person, (not for personal reasons, 10but for work reasons), then that enslaved person, is your work-slave. -- This can be split into two categories: direct work-slaves, and indirect work-slaves. Direct work-slaves, are children, adults, who you directly use, enslave, to do work, chores, jobs, etc, (whether for some of the time, or all of the time). -- A basic example of this, is a house maid, servant, slave. However, there are also many other examples. Eg, you force your children, (when they're old enough), to be a slave (get a job, and do their own chores), because this means that they're then doing their own job, work, chores (to keep themselves alive), so that you can then continue to use them, as your personal-slave, (but without you having to pay for things (food, water, shelter, etc), to keep them alive, or doing the basic chores, which are necessary to keep them alive). c) Indirect work-slaves. Indirect work-slaves, are people, entities, and you want these people, entities, to be constantly created, born (and kept alive), because you want to use them, to do work for you (indirectly). Eg, you want people (who you don't directly know), to work (be a slave) at jobs, because you want to have: electricity and water in your home, and to have food in shops, and to have your trash taken away, etc. And, or, you want other people to deal with certain things, that you don't want to deal with yourself, (eg, dealing with: dead people, old incapacitated people, sewage, making clothes, things in factories, etc). ---------- Note: This information about indirect work-slaves, is only half of the story. -- Ie, one half of the story, is that people want babies to be constantly created, born (and kept alive), so that they can be used as indirect work-slaves. -- However, the other half of the story, is that people don't just want this, but they also (inherently) want: A) Them to be brainwashed, programmed to get jobs. B) Them to be brainwashed, programmed to not leave their jobs. C) A fail-safe system, to make sure that they do not (and, or 11cannot) leave their jobs. D) Them to be deeply brainwashed, programmed, to believe (as a matter of fact), that they should never kill themselves. (I’ll explain all of this in detail, in the long conclusion.) And the brainwashing, programming will be so deep, that they won’t even know that it’s been put inside them. -- This is always necessary, because otherwise they would kill themselves. This is obvious, because if a person can’t escape a situation of suffering (which is going to last decades long), then they will want to escape from life. E) A fail-safe system, to make sure that they can't kill themselves easily. -- Ie, if the brainwashing, programming (from the previous point) starts to fail, then they might want to kill themselves, however, many of them won’t do it, if they can’t get the equipment, medicine needed, to kill themselves in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed way. Ie, the reason why they can’t get this equipment, medicine, etc, is because it’s been made illegal. -------------------- Note: It’s important to recognise (and admit), that these last two points (D and E), are not just what people want for their indirect work-slaves, but also for their personal-slaves. Moreover, most people, societies, want all five of these points (A to E), not just for their work-slaves, but also for their personal-slaves. And, 3. People are only forcing other people to stay in life, existence, for selfish (malevolent) reasons, purposes. -- These reasons, purposes, are to keep being able to use, enslave these newly created babies, children (and future adults), as personal-slaves, and, or work-slaves. -- And, of course, this can only be done, if they make sure, that no one is provided, with the most fundamental of rights, (the freedom, choice, option, to move away from suffering, in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way, whenever they want). -------------------- 12Note: When talking about personal-slaves and work-slaves, one important point that needs to be seen from all of this, is that: People create babies, children, with the intent to enslave them, (as personal-slaves, and, or work-slaves). Moreover, this is what people call: “love”, “care”, “moral”, “selfless”, etc. And, almost all people think that this behaviour is acceptable, ok, important, etc, (even if they don't have (or want) children themselves). ---------- Note: People say that they “care”, but all they really care about, is doing just enough, to ensure that all slaves (personal-slaves and work-slaves) are: 1. Kept alive. 2. Kept in a useable state. Ie, people will do everything in their power, to make sure that their personal-slaves are healthy (and kept alive), because they want to use them. -- Indeed, this is to be expected, because a dead personal-slave, is of no use to them, and an unhealthy personal-slave, is unpleasant to use, (or is unusable). ---------- And what compounds this, is the fact that all people know, that it takes a lot of time, energy, money, effort, etc, to: 1. Find, and then condition, groom, a partner, friend, lover, into a good personal-slave, (ie, one which fulfils your desires). 2. Create, and then condition, groom, a baby, child, into a good personal-slave, (ie, one which fulfils your desires). Ie, this makes people even more determined to make sure, that their personal-slaves never have any real fundamental freedom, choice, option, (eg, the freedom, choice, option to leave life). -------------------- Note: Since everyone is doing this immoral behaviour, this means that everyone is constantly trying to hide their immoral behaviour. However, even after hiding it, they continue to keep brainwashing, programming everyone, because they want to be allowed to do all of this immoral behaviour, in plain-sight. Of course, the result of all this, is inevitable, where everyone has brainwashed, programmed everyone to such a degree, that everyone now believes (and 13sees) black (suffering) as white. And indeed, this is why people are seeing everything in life, upside-down. And it’s important to see, that the things which are the most upside-down, are the most important things in life. -- And, the most important things in life, are the ones to do with suffering. -- And this is why there's so much suffering in the world. ---------- And, it’s important to see that: There will always be suffering in the world, because people want (and need) suffering to exist. The reason why people want (and need) suffering to exist, is because pain, suffering is a weapon, tactic which everyone uses, to control, manipulate, brainwash, program, condition their personal-slaves (and work-slaves). -- Indeed, pain, suffering, is the number one weapon, tactic, as a punishment, and reward. It might sound strange to say “and reward”, but everyone does this. Ie, everyone uses pain, suffering not only for punishment, but also for reward, (ie, the reward is that the perpetrator temporarily ceases to cause pain, suffering to their personal-slave). ---------- Of course, what this means, is that feelings, sensation, awareness, etc, are all only necessary, to create an entity that is able to be used, enslaved, raped. -- Ie, feelings, sensation, awareness, consciousness, etc, are all only created, for malevolent purposes. Of course, many people try to brainwash, program everyone to believe, that awareness, feelings, sensations, consciousness, memory, etc, are good, great, divine, etc. -- However, it's obvious, that they are cruel, evil things, because there is no choice in them. Ie, Unless you can get rid of awareness, consciousness, memory, etc, in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way, (whenever you want), then these things are inherently (by definition), weapons, tactics, which are deliberately designed to create imprisonment, torture, slavery, rape. And since Awareness, consciousness, memory, etc, is what “existence” is, this inherently means that “Existence” is also a thing, that is a weapon, tactic, which is deliberately designed to create imprisonment, torture, slavery, rape. 14-------------------- And therefore, It is to be expected, that existence will always be inherently causing suffering. And therefore, To reduce, prevent, eliminate suffering, there is no other option, except to end existence, forever. -------------------- And, no matter which way you come at it, the result is always the same. -- Eg, it's obvious that all these things (feelings, sensation, awareness, consciousness, etc) are malevolent, because anything that is done for benevolent reasons, would want all people, entities, dimensions, to have zero pain, suffering (and ultimate freedom, peace, love, bliss). And, the only thing which is zero pain, suffering (and ultimate freedom, peace, love, bliss), is “That”, (non-existence). Ie, if you are benevolent, then the only thing worth creating, is “That”. However, “That”, is something that only exists, in the absence of creation, existence. Therefore, if you are benevolent, you will inherently: 1. Not create any creation, existence. 2. Not perpetuate any creation, existence. 3. End the whole of existence, in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way. And therefore, any action that is anything other than these three things, is (by definition) malevolent. -------------------- Note: If anyone is concerned that this conclusion is finding that everything in existence is malevolent, then let me clarify this situation for you. After you are able to clearly, honestly see everything in life, existence, it’s just so obvious, that: It is all malevolent, because if it was benevolent, there would be zero suffering. 15It’s just that simple. ------------------------------ And therefore, it really is true, that all types of enlightenment, (and all types of paths to enlightenment), are malevolent. And this is so obvious, because it’s obvious that the only thing worth having, being, is the thing which is zero suffering for all (and ultimate freedom, peace, love, bliss for all), which is “That”, (non-existence). Ie, all statements about enlightenment being malevolent, are true, (and this is regardless of whatever definitions are used, (and regardless of whether it’s called: enlightenment, awakening, self-realisation, ascension, descension, or whatever else)). -- Of course, the only exception to this, is if it’s accepted that, There is only one true definition of enlightenment, which is that: True enlightenment occurs, when the whole of existence permanently becomes “That”, (non-existence). -------------------- And therefore, it’s obvious that: There is only one ideal path to true enlightenment, which is to end the whole of existence, in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way. -------------------- And, of course, since “True enlightenment occurs, when the whole of existence permanently becomes “That”, (non-existence)”, then what this means, is that there can’t be any things like “enlightened people” (or enlightened: beings, entities, societies, worlds, times, eras, dimensions, realms, etc). Note: With this true type of enlightenment, there’s absolutely no need to discuss anything about it, because there’s absolutely no ambiguity, (nor issues about interpretation, nor anything to dispute, nor any other stupidity), because this enlightenment is about the whole of existence as “That” (non-existence), and in non-existence, there are: • No teachings. • No teachers, (and no enlightened people, beings, etc). • No students, disciples, followers, etc. • No special places, (eg, ashrams, monasteries, etc). • No rules, dogma, etc. • No person that can get enlightenment. • No special powers. • No such thing as enlightenment, (or awakening, self-realisation, etc). • No special, higher dimensions (or realms, etc). 16• No god. • No existence. • Etc. Indeed, it’s even ridiculous to use the term enlightenment. ---------- Of course, when you understand all of this, you then realise, that all the things which people call enlightenment, spirituality, religion, god, etc, are nothing but weapons, tactics to control, manipulate, use, enslave people, (as personal-slaves, and, or work-slaves). Note: All of this causes suffering, but the blame for all of this, is on the people, (not on the institutions, organisations, systems), because people are constantly creating (and, or perpetuating the existence of) these religions, institutions, groups, organisations, systems, etc, because they want to use these things, to control, manipulate, enslave their personal-slaves (and, or work-slaves). Ie, all these things cause suffering, but people want them to be kept in existence, because people want to use them, as part of their arsenal of weapons, tactics. And, of course, that is only part of their arsenal. -- Ie, there are many other weapons, tactics, including all the rules, beliefs, systems (legal, moral, social, interpersonal, personal, religious, spiritual, etc), across all aspects of life. And, it’s important to remember, that: All of this is created (and, or perpetuated), purely because people want to use, enslave people, (as personal-slaves, and, or work-slaves). -------------------------------------------------- Note: It’s important to see, how all the information in this conclusion, is applicable to all levels of life. One example of this, is that a person can use the information provided, to truly, totally deprogram themselves, and even if they start at the superficial levels, it will lead them to ever-deeper levels, and then to “That”. -- To give an example of this, let’s use the following obvious statement. To reduce the prison, torture, slavery, rape, that is in your life, you have to recognise (and admit), the prison, torture, slavery, rape, that you are in. This is obviously a superficial level of deprograming, however, it does lead you to ever-deeper levels, and then to “That”. -- To make this clearer, we can re-word it, as follows: To reduce the prison, torture, slavery, rape, that is in your life, 17you have to recognise (and admit), the prison, torture, slavery, rape, that is your life. And, this is true for all levels. Ie, it’s true for the individual, and for existence itself. -- Indeed, to make this clearer, we can re-word it, as follows: To reduce the prison, torture, slavery, rape, that is in existence, you have to recognise (and admit), the prison, torture, slavery, rape, that is existence. Ie, it then becomes very obvious, that the only solution, is to end existence. And then, what remains, is “That”, (non-existence). ---------- Note: What all of this should be beginning to show, is that the idea of ending existence, (in order to end all suffering (for all)), is not some out-there desperate idea, but instead, it's just the only solution. -------------------------------------------------- However, let’s bring it down to the level of the individual again. It’s important to realise, that to solve any problems in life (no matter how small), you need to examine everything. Indeed, this is obvious, because life is something that is made up from many different aspects, subjects, topics (in and of life), and these are all interrelated, and inextricably interlinked. -- Therefore, if you make even the smallest of changes to one aspect of life, the other aspects will all be affected. Therefore, if you want to solve problems in life, you can't just solve one aspect at a time, (because this will solve one aspect, but cause problems in all other aspects of life). Therefore, you have to examine it all, or not bother. Indeed, doing anything else, will just create more problems, suffering. ---------- And what is also obvious, is that to reduce, prevent, eliminate suffering, the absolute deepest issues in life must be analysed. -- By “deepest”, I mean the absolute deepest, because if there are 100 levels, but you only analyse 99 levels, then all those 99 levels which you analysed, can all be incorrect, bad, upside-down, because all those 99 levels, are built on top of the most fundamental level, (which you have not analysed). A good example of not analysing a fundamental level, can be seen in the subject of 18suffering. -- Eg, if you've been brainwashed, programmed to believe that “suffering is acceptable and necessary”, then when you do an activity in life, which makes you suffer, you just think that “suffering is acceptable and necessary”, and therefore, you'll just keep doing that same activity, and therefore, you'll keep suffering. Ie, this will keep happening, until you analyse (and deprogram) the brainwashing, programming in you, which made you believe that “suffering is acceptable and necessary”. -------------------- However, even if you do analyse all of the fundamental levels, issues in life, it is also vital, that you analyse all of the other levels, (all the way up to the most superficial levels). Most people do not do this, and this makes their knowledge (about the fundamental level), meaningless (due to it being an incomplete picture, understanding of the whole), and therefore, this will inevitably lead them to cause suffering (to themselves, and others, and everyone). ---------- Of course, most people don't want to examine all levels, because that is their tactic. Ie, to avoid learning that they’re a selfish, immoral, cruel person, they simply avoid examining certain levels. -- Eg, if someone is exposing them as being selfish, immoral, then they’ll hide behind some quotes which refer to some deeper level, (eg, the level of non-duality). Indeed, it’s common to hear people try to escape their immoral actions, by saying things like: “There is no good, bad, right, wrong, moral, immoral”. Of course, after you know about the “neutral, natural, true start-point (for everything)”, these people will not be able to escape via those tactics. And neither will you. And neither will anyone. -- I’ll explain this in more detail, at the end of this short conclusion. -------------------- Of course, because those people will not be able to escape via any of those tactics, they will then resort to other tactics, (eg, sly, subtle ridicule, shaming, etc). Indeed, this is common in all aspects of life, (eg, relationships, friendships, family, etc). Note: It’s important to see, that because people are constantly being immoral (by using, enslaving people (as their personal-slaves, and, or work-slaves)), this means that they're going to be constantly trying to say things to you, in an attempt to brainwash, program you, and this will keep happening, until they succeed in making you believe that their immoral actions, are moral and acceptable. Therefore, if you know that what they’re doing is immoral, then it’s important to realise, that this will never end. -- Ie, they will never be able to give up trying to brainwash, program you. And indeed, they can’t ever give up, because they need everyone around them to believe that 19using, enslaving people as personal-slaves (and work-slaves) is moral and acceptable, because otherwise they will begin to feel guilty about all the suffering that they’re causing their personal-slaves (and work-slaves). Therefore, since this could go on forever, if you want to reduce, prevent, eliminate some suffering in your life, all you need to remember, is that as soon as you see anyone trying to subtly, slyly use all kinds of brainwashing, programming, control, manipulation, tactics (of whatever kind) on you, then you just naturally see that as a warning sign (of what they’re truly like), and therefore, you realise that the only wise course of action, is to instantly end the relationship, interaction, and permanently cut all communication with them, forever. ---------- Side note: You do not need to give them any explanation, answer (about why you want to leave the relationship, interaction, and cut all communication with them, forever). -- However, if they want an explanation, answer, (and if you want to say one last thing (which might help them)), then just tell them that they will have their answer (and all their answers), if they examine the situation with ever-deeper honesty. ---------- Side note: The term “ever-deeper honesty”, refers to the process of being honest in ever-deeper ways. This is different to the term “Ever Deeper Honesty”, which refers to the title of this book. (This is explained a bit more, on the last page of this book.) -------------------------------------------------- Note: Many people will try to say (argue) that: 1. “I am not using people as personal-slaves, or work-slaves.” 2. “I give people freedom.” 3. “Life is not prison, torture, slavery, rape.” 4. “Life is not just 99% suffering, with a small scrap of happiness, peace for 1% of the time.” 5. Etc. The key point is, that none of this needs to be discussed, because it’s all just words, excuses, lies, misdirection, deceit, gaslighting, etc. -- This is true, because all of the issues in these statements (in points 1 to 4 (above)), are not things that are debatable, because it’s indisputable that all these issues exist, as soon as people, society are doing the things, that the type B people, society do. Indeed, a simple way to see this, is that: If a person honestly believes these statements (in points 1 to 4 (above)), then they will have absolutely no issue with proving it. Ie, if they believe these statements, then they can prove this, by allowing a charity to be created, which will provide everyone with two things: 201. A building, (which will be in every town), which absolutely any person can walk into, and ask to leave life, in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed way. 2. A service, (which will be in every town), which absolutely any person can phone, to request a person to come to their home, so that they can leave life, in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed way. And, this charity, service, building, will allow the person to choose any method of death, including the option to have an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed death whilst they’re in the deepest states of deep sleep. (Note: Many people would want this type of death, for many reasons, which I’ll explain in the long conclusion. Indeed when you see the reasons, you’ll see that many people would prefer this over a natural death, or suicide, or the usual methods of assisted-suicide (consensual-murder). -- Indeed, this is obvious, because there is no type of death that is more peaceful, than an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed death whilst a person is in the deepest states of deep sleep. The key point is, that the time for talk, debate, conversation (ie, excuses, lies, misdirection, deceit, gaslighting, etc), is over, because this freedom to move away from suffering, either exists, or it doesn’t. Indeed, you are either a type A person, society, or a type B person, society. And, this is not about trying to use words to convince (lie) about which one you are, because no conversation is needed, because a simple observation will reveal if: • You use people as personal-slaves (and, or work-slaves), or not. • This charity, service, building exists, or not. • Babies are being brought into existence, or not. • You are trapping, imprisoning, enslaving, torturing, raping people, via creating (and, or perpetuating) various rules, beliefs, systems (legal, moral, social, interpersonal, personal, religious, spiritual, etc), or not. • Etc. Note: It’s important to realise, that this does not require intelligence, nor does it depend on believing people, governments, organisations, groups (whether official, or unofficial, alternative, or whatever else). Ie, each person can do this for themselves. Ie, each person can see if this charity, service, building exits, for them. Ie, each person can 21check for themselves, whether they (themselves) have access to this charity, service, building. Indeed, it’s vital that each person has access to this charity, service, building, because it’s vital that not one person, entity is excluded. And therefore, this charity, service, building, has to be restriction free. Ie, there are no requirements (eg, age, class, gender, race, etc), and also, there are no checks, no waiting, delaying, nor any other sly tactics. -- Indeed, you simply phone (or walk into) this charity, service, building, and you are then provided with instant freedom from this life of prison, torture, slavey, rape, and it all happens in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed way. And it’s important to see, that doing anything other than this, is outright immoral, cruel, evil, since it is directly causing people to suffer an entire lifetime of prison, torture, slavey, rape (suffering). ---------- Side note: Any people who say that “Everyone already has the freedom, to just go and commit suicide”, are totally ignorant (and selfish, immoral), because: 1. A quick think (or listen) about the subject of suicide, reveals that there is absolutely no method of suicide, which provides an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed death. And, the last one of those words, (“guaranteed”), is (arguably) the most important one, because all methods of suicide can easily, accidentally go wrong, and then you still end up having to be in this despicable life, but in a situation, life of even more suffering. 2. Many people only want to leave life, whilst they have: a) Absolutely zero negative thoughts (in their head). And, b) Absolutely zero negative emotions, energies (in their body). There are a whole variety of reasons why people will want this. What this means, is that they only want to leave life, if there is a method which provides an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed way out of life whilst they’re in the deepest states of deep sleep. And for most people, this is an impossible thing to set-up (and do) by themselves, especially since a lot of the equipment that is needed to do this, is illegal. -- And, if people help each other with this, then despite the fact that this act is moral (since it ends suffering), and is consensual (ie, it is consensual-murder), it is illegal. The key point is, that most of these people do not want to do any illegal things, 22because this might lead to being put in jail, which is a situation, life of even more suffering. 3. Many people will not be able to commit suicide, because they’ve been brainwashed, programmed (since birth), with thousands of rules, beliefs, systems (legal, moral, social, interpersonal, personal, religious, spiritual, etc), and this has been done directly and indirectly, and all of these rules, beliefs, systems, sit on top of very deep programs, beliefs, (eg, the belief, idea, story, lie, gaslighting that: “Life is good, death is bad”). Ie, they might have removed many programs from themselves (ie, deprogramed themselves a bit), however, they might not be able to remove this belief, program, because they do not know that it is in them (because it was put into them in an indirect way). (I’ll explain this in more detail, later in this short conclusion.) Note: It’s important to remember, that all of this brainwashing, programming, teaching, conditioning is done, purely so that people can use, enslave, rape people, (as their personal-slaves, and, or work-slaves). 4. Etc. The level of how selfish, immoral, cruel, evil this all is, will become increasingly apparent, when these terms (“personal-slaves”, “direct work-slaves”, and “indirect work-slaves”), are examined with ever-deeper honesty, (which I will do, in the long conclusion). -- And, you will then also understand, the importance of using words like “cruel, evil”. Indeed, there are many very good reasons why these words need to be used, (but it must be done in a fair, equal, neutral way). ------------------------------ Note: Earlier on, I mentioned the issue that: Life is 99% suffering, with a small scrap of happiness, peace (for 1% of the time). This is true, if you include all types of suffering (including light, mild suffering), and it’s calculated across your entire lifetime. This is all obvious, if you’re able to clearly observe life, with ever-deeper honesty. -- This is a big issue to cover, because all aspects of life, need to be covered. So this will all be done in detail, in the long conclusion. Of course, doing this in detail, needs to be done for many other reasons, eg: to show that all things in life are pointing in the same direction, (towards “That”, (non-existence)), and this includes even the most amazing moments in life, (including: divine ecstasy, pure pleasure, orgasms, true happiness, etc). 23---------- Note: All of that information (in the long conclusion), will be able to help you permanently reduce some suffering (in many different aspects of your life). However, if you want to permanently eliminate all suffering in your life, then: You have to open your mind, to the fact that the solution to this, is not in life, existence, but from life, existence. ------------------------------ Note: No matter where you start from, this solution, conclusion is always the same. Before moving onto the summary, let’s run through this solution, conclusion in a slightly different way, as follows. To get to the key point, let's start from here: People are (obviously) not free, because they're not provided with an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way out of life, whenever they want. And, the only reason why people are not provided with an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way out of life, is because: Everyone wants to imprison, torture, enslave, rape everyone, (as their personal-slaves, and, or work-slaves). And therefore, this means that: Life will always inherently be prison, torture, slavery, rape. And therefore, this means that: Life will always inherently be suffering. ---------- Indeed, a clear, honest observation of life, will show you that all of the statements (in this conclusion) are true. -- And, no matter which way you come at it, the result is always the same, which is that: Life is suffering. And, if you're able to see clearly, honestly, you'll see how even the most amazing, wonderful things in life, are inextricably interlinked with suffering. ---------- So, from all of the above, we can then say that: 24Since, Suffering is unacceptable and unnecessary. And, Life is suffering. It inherently follows, that Life is unacceptable and unnecessary. And therefore, that Existence is unacceptable and unnecessary. -------------------- However, The ultimate permanent solution, to all problems, pain, suffering, discomfort, in life (and existence), is the same as, The ultimate permanent freedom, peace, love, bliss, (which everyone is seeking, desiring), and therefore, All desires, fears, seeking, and realisations, will inevitably all lead to this one-same-thing, which is “That”, (non-existence). ---------- And therefore, it becomes clear that some of these previous statements (eg, “Existence is unacceptable and unnecessary”), is not a bad thing, because everyone’s (deepest) desire, is for “That”, (non-existence). ------------------------------ Indeed, when you see things clearly, honestly, you realise that everything is actually pointing in this direction. Eg, earlier on in this conclusion, I said: “the type A people, society, aren't trying to be moral (or whatever else), they just simply don't want any person, thing to suffer.” Of course, I only said this as a stepping-stone, because the truth is that: By the time a society is truly 100% moral, it is non-existent. 25Ie, even if people, society are 90% moral, they will still have suffering in their lives, (because suffering will still be caused, because there is still 10% immorality), and therefore, they will naturally be propelled to keep eliminating suffering (in ever-deeper ways, (and at ever-deeper levels), until there is zero suffering, for all people, entities, beings, at all levels, including existence itself. Note: From this previous statement (“By the time a society is truly 100% moral, it is nonexistent”), it’s obvious that: By the time a society is truly worth living in, it is non-existent. -------------------- And indeed, all of this is true at all levels, and therefore, when this is applied at the level of the individual person, it is realised that: By the time a person, entity is truly 100% moral, it is non-existent. And from this, it’s obvious that: By the time a person, body, consciousness is truly worth living in (having), it is non-existent. ---------- And when this is applied at the level of existence, it is realised that: By the time existence is truly 100% moral, it is non-existent, (ie, non-existence, ie, “That”). And from this, it’s obvious that: By the time existence is truly worth living in (having), it is non-existent, (ie, non-existence, ie, “That”). ---------- And therefore, the inescapable conclusion, is that: The only thing truly worth living in (having)(being), is “That”, (non-existence). -------------------------------------------------- Therefore, from all of the above, it becomes obvious, that no matter where you start, it always comes down to the same conclusion, realisation, solution, desire, which is that: The ideal permanent solution, desire, of how to end all suffering (for all) (and 26get “That” which is beyond freedom, peace, love, bliss), is to end existence, in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way. It might sound strange (to some people), to say that existence can be ended (instantly, painlessly), but it is a practical possibility, (because anything that is created, can be ended). And, this is true, no matter whether the creation of existence, is: a projection, holographic, virtual, real, solid, a computer simulation, etc. Note: Perhaps only certain people, entities, have the ability to end existence, (in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way). Or, perhaps it needs a few people, entities, to be able to do this, (and, or, perhaps this needs to be 0.1% of the population). And, or, perhaps certain devices, equipment are needed. However, whatever the case, the important thing to realise, is that: Life, existence can be ended, and it will definitely be ended, because it’s already happening. -- Indeed, life, existence is naturally, inherently, inevitably going to end, because “life” (and “existence”), are just systems, and no systems is 100%. -- Ie, all systems will naturally, inherently, inevitably crack, and then they will keep cracking, until they no longer exist. -- Ie, it’s not a matter of “if”, but “when”. ---------- However, it’s also important to remember, that when speaking about any type of systems (eg, political, societal, financial, interpersonal, personal, religious, spiritual, etc), it is obvious that: All systems are going to (inherently) always cause suffering. And therefore: The longer the system continues, the longer the suffering will drag on. Ie: The longer the system continues (until the system totally ends, (no longer exists)), the longer the suffering will drag on. ---------- And, since life, existence is a system, this means that: The longer existence continues (until existence totally ends, (no longer exists)), the longer the suffering will drag on. ------------------------------ And, of course, the speed at which a system will come to an end, is dependent on various 27factors. Indeed, a good example is that: A building can’t collapse, end, if people, entities are constantly maintaining, perpetuating that building. Ie, in more general terms: A system can’t collapse, end, if people, entities are constantly maintaining, perpetuating that system. And at a deeper level, this means that: Existence can’t collapse, end, if people, entities are constantly maintaining, perpetuating that existence. And what this means, is that: Suffering can’t collapse, end, if people, entities are constantly maintaining, perpetuating that suffering. ---------- Therefore, everyone needs to realise, recognise, admit, that: 1. “Life” (and “existence”), are just systems. 2. All systems cause suffering. 3. The only true permanent way to end all suffering (for all), is to instantly, painlessly end all systems. And therefore, 4. The ultimate permanent solution, to end all suffering (for all), is to instantly, painlessly end existence, because then what remains, is “That” (which is beyond: peace, love, bliss, pain, suffering, etc), which is what everyone is truly wanting. And, the only way that this will all happen quicker, is if people recognise, admit, all the key points in this conclusion, eg, that: • Life (and existence) is prison, torture, slavery, rape. • Life (and existence) is survival of the stupidest. • Suffering is unacceptable, and unnecessary. • Using, enslaving people (as personal-slaves, and, or work-slaves), is unacceptable, and unnecessary. 28• Life (and existence) is unacceptable, and unnecessary. • Etc. ---------- And it’s important to realise, that this will all just naturally happen, if people just stop deluding, lying, misdirecting, brainwashing, programming, gaslighting themselves (and others). -- Ie, just stop with all that selfishness, stupidity, immorality, because it only causes you (and everyone) suffering, because you (and everyone) are just perpetuating suffering. However, do not see the things that I'm saying in this conclusion, as new beliefs to cling to. -- Actually, this is not an issue, because all of this information will do it’s job, and then dissolve itself. Indeed, this is obvious, because if people, societies act on this type of information, it will naturally propel them to keep moving towards less and less suffering and ever-deeper freedom, peace, love, bliss, until all that remains, is “That”. ---------------------------------------- Note: A typical argument (excuse, misdirection), that many people will say, is: “If all people, entities, things, dimensions (and existence itself), are all inevitably heading towards “That”, then nothing needs to be done”. The simple answer to this, is that: Doing this is fine, if you want to suffer. Indeed, it all just depends on how much people, societies want to suffer. -- I’ll explain this as follows. In terms of how much people, societies want to suffer, this can be broken down into three options: Option 1: Extreme long-term suffering, will happen to all people, societies which are taking the indirect (totally opposite direction) route (to “That”). What I mean by the “indirect (totally opposite direction) route”, is that these people, societies are choosing a route of being selfish, immoral, bad, which will cause themselves immense long-term suffering, and this will keep happening, until the suffering becomes so extreme, that they are then forced to stop and examine all things in life (and life, existence itself). However, if they do not examine all aspects of life (and all levels of life, and life, existence itself, (in a clear, honest ever-deeper way)), then they will have to suffer more, (ie, keep going through this cycle-of-suffering), until they realise that the ultimate (and only) solution to suffering, is the same as the ultimate freedom, peace, love, bliss, which is “That”, (non-existence). 29And therefore, all their actions (from that point onwards), is to help them (and everyone) get directly to “That”. Ie, all their actions are then moral. Whereas, the way that they were before, was purely about them living a selfish, immoral, bad life, where they used, enslaved other people, (as personal-slaves, and, or work-slaves). Side note: Just to reiterate this point, yes, I did use the word “bad”, because there is good, bad, (and: right, wrong, moral, immoral, etc). This is obvious, and I’ll explain this in more detail, when I explain the neutral, natural, true start-point (for everything), in the summary. Option 2: Short-term suffering, will happen to all people, societies which are taking the direct route (to “That”). These people, societies are just naturally moral, (ie, they just naturally do not want to cause suffering to others). -- And therefore: A) They just naturally do not want to bring any babies, entities into existence. B) They just naturally want to provide all people, entities, with the freedom, choice, option, to leave life, existence, in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way. C) They just naturally want to help deprogram any person, entity (who wants to truly, fully deprogram themselves). -- And, obviously, these people, societies, no longer brainwash, program anyone. Note: It’s important to see, that deprogramming will naturally happen (without external help), as soon as the constant brainwashing, programming (which everyone is constantly doing to each other) stops. Indeed, this is inevitable, because when someone suffers, they naturally stop to investigate what caused their suffering. However, in selfish, immoral societies, they get constantly told, brainwashed, programmed to believe that that suffering (which they are directly experiencing), is acceptable, important, necessary, etc, and therefore, this causes them to repeat the cycle-of-suffering. An analogy of this, is that you burn your hand on a hot stove, and therefore, you then remove it. However, you 30then get brainwashed, programmed to believe that that suffering (which you just experienced), is something that you must just accept (because: “That’s just part of life”, “You must be strong”, “You must persevere and succeed”, etc). -- Of course, if you accept this, then you’re going to put your hand back on the hot stove. And so the cycle-of-suffering continues. Option 3: Zero suffering, will happen to all people, societies which are taking the instant route (to “That”). These people, societies know that option 1 is pure stupidity (because why would you want to cause suffering to yourself). And they also know, that option 2 is good, but it’s still a little bit stupid, (because if you know that the ultimate end result, solution, desire, is “That”, then why not just go straight to “That”). And therefore, these people, societies will try to end existence, in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way. ---------- There is also a fourth option, which is those people, societies who are doing option 2 and 3 (simultaneously). Ie, whist trying to do option 3, they’re also doing option 2. Note: It’s important to realise, that even if people believe that option 3 is too difficult (or impossible, or whatever else), there is absolutely no excuse for not doing option 2, because points A, B and C (mentioned in option 2 (above)), are all able to be done by all people, societies, because A, B and C, do not need some skills (or technology) which only exists in the future. Ie, it’s all able to be done right now. And therefore, there is absolutely no way, excuse, for any people, societies, to justify their immoral behaviour. ------------------------------ Note: Some people might say, that after existence ends, it will just restart again. Ie, it won’t be permanent. This argument can be countered, and I will explain this all in more detail, in the long conclusion. Indeed, all arguments are countered. However, what is more important to see, is that all such arguments are not only countered, but are actually totally irrelevant. This might sound strange, but it’s true. I’ll explain why, in the long conclusion. The key point is, that no matter what arguments are used, or what aspect of life you’re examining, (and I will examine all aspects of everyday life), the ultimate solution, desire is always the same, which is zero suffering (for all), and “That” (for all), by ending existence, in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way. 31-------------------------------------------------- Note: It’s important to see, that I could have written all of this, without any mention of “That”, and without any discussion about ending the whole of existence. -- Indeed, I could have just said that: The conclusion of this book, is that everyone has one choice to make. (This choice will determine everything in your life, including how much you will suffer, and how much freedom, peace, love, bliss there will be in your life). This choice that has to be made, is between: Option A: You choose to believe that: “Suffering is acceptable”. Option B: You choose to believe that: “Suffering is unacceptable”. ---------- It really is that simple. Nothing more needs to be said. The reason why nothing more needs to be said, is because after this choice is made, everything will naturally follow. ---------- Of course, if a person, society chooses option A, then they will create (and perpetuate) suffering (for themselves, and everyone else). This is inevitable, because they believe that “Suffering is acceptable”. Note: When they do suffer, they have no right to complain, (because it’s absolutely ridiculous to complain about suffering, if you believe that “Suffering is acceptable”). Basically, if a person choose option A, it will be like a person punching themselves in their face (with their own fist), and then they’ll complain that it hurts (and that they’re suffering), but they’ll just keep doing this over and over again. And, despite the fact that they’re suffering, they will tell other people to do the same thing. Of course, the only way that this can all permanently stop, is when they change to option B (and choose to believe that “Suffering is unacceptable”). This is obvious, because whilst they believe that “Suffering is acceptable”, it’s just impossible for them to break the cycle-of-suffering. 32Ie, these people are literally creating their own suffering. ---------- Question: So, why do people choose option A? Answer: The reason why people choose option A, is because they want to believe (and need to believe, and have to believe) that “Suffering is acceptable”, because they can’t believe that “Suffering is unacceptable”, and then have babies, (because everyone knows that babies will suffer regularly, throughout their entire lifetime). -- Ie, they know that the baby will suffer regularly (throughout it’s entire lifetime), and if they believe that “Suffering is unacceptable”, and then have a baby, then that would make them indisputably immoral, cruel, (because they are causing suffering to a person, for an entire lifetime). And they also know, that if they believe that “Suffering is unacceptable”, and they then use, enslave people as their personal-slaves, (and, or work-slaves), then they are also indisputably immoral, cruel, because everyone knows that all personal-slaves (and workslaves) suffer regularly (throughout their entire lifetime). ---------- And another reason why people choose to believe that “Suffering is acceptable”, is because the only other alternative, is to believe that “Suffering is unacceptable”, and as soon as you truly believe (and naturally live) this, then everything in your life will start to shatter (in ever-deeper ways) as you realise that you have been brainwashed, programmed, used, enslaved (in ever-deeper ways). And you also realise, that you have been brainwashing, programming, using, enslaving people. And therefore, you have to accept, admit that you have been a selfish, immoral, cruel person, and perhaps even an evil person (if you caused any people long-term suffering). And then you also realise, that life (and existence) is prison, torture, slavery, rape, and that life (and existence) is cruel, evil. -- And therefore, this means that life (and existence) is survival of the stupidest. And the problem is, that all of these realisations, are inescapable, because it applies to all aspects of life, and all levels of life, existence. And therefore, for most people, the implications become too much to bear, and therefore, they prefer to stay in delusion, (and the only way to do this, is to believe that “Suffering is acceptable”). Side note: They might believe, argue that “suffering is necessary”, (and, or that “suffering is important”, and, or that “life is perfect”, or whatever else), but this is all just another way of trying to brainwash, program themselves (and others) to believe that “Suffering is acceptable”. I’ll explain this (and all other such brainwashing, programming, lies, gaslighting) in detail, in the long conclusion. -------------------- 33Note: It’s important to see, that this lie, delusion, is not just something that causes them suffering, because this lie, delusion (that “Suffering is acceptable”), only gains weight (becomes real enough), if they’re able to make other people believe it. This is why everyone is constantly trying to brainwash, program everyone with it, (directly, and indirectly). And, to make this belief have practical weight, they then also have to brainwash, program themselves (and others), to believe that it’s acceptable to have personal-slaves, and work-slaves, and babies. So, the key thing to see, is that: Just because they don’t want to face the truth (of how things really are in life, existence), they’re willing to cause other people suffering, just so that it makes them feel a bit better. And, in the case of believing that it’s ok for them (and, or other people) to have babies, they’re causing immense amounts of suffering, because every baby that is born, will suffer regularly, throughout it’s entire lifetime. Ie, everyone is suffering regularly in their everyday lives, and the reason why this is all happening, is because people keep brainwashing, programming everyone to believe that having a baby is acceptable, good, important, necessary, etc. Ie, so much suffering is caused to everyone, and it all keeps happening (in endless cycles), because people want to make themselves feel a bit better, (by deluding themselves enough, to avoid having to face the truth (of how things really are in life, existence)). And the key words in that last sentence, are “a bit”, because even after doing all of this (causing a lifetime of suffering to others), they still end up suffering most of the time. Therefore, these people, societies are the definition of stupid, and they are indisputably selfish, immoral, cruel, evil. -- And it must be seen, that these four words (selfish, immoral, cruel, evil), can’t ever begin to describe the fact, that these type A people, societies, are causing billions of people a lifetime of suffering, generation after generation. -------------------- And, what is also important to see, is that: These people have to brainwash, program themselves (and others), to believe that it's acceptable for people to have babies, because if they start to believe that it's not acceptable to have a baby, (because having a baby is selfish, immoral, cruel, evil, because life is prison, torture, slavery, rape), then they would also have to accept, that life is prison, torture, slavery, rape. And, of course, If a person accepts that life is prison, torture, slavery, rape, then they also have to accept, that life is survival of the stupidest. 34And, of course, If a person accepts that life is survival of the stupidest, then they also have to accept, that the only wise action, is to leave life, existence, as soon as possible. -------------------- Ie, the key point is: That as soon as the person accepts, that the act of having babies, is selfish, immoral, cruel, evil, then their whole life gets turned upside-down, (in a very traumatic way). -- And, since people do not like their lives to be turned upside-down, (in a very traumatic way), then what this means, is that they'll try to stay in 100% denial, delusion. And, of course, They can't stay in this denial, delusion, unless everyone else is also creating, perpetuating (and living in) this same denial, delusion. Ie, this is why, everyone is in denial, delusion. -- And, of course, where there is denial, delusion, there will always be suffering. Note: All people are in denial, delusion, (to varying degrees), and all people have more than one delusion, denial, (which are all happening simultaneously). -- However, the key point here, is that the previous few paragraphs, are talking about a denial, delusion, which is on the level of life, existence itself. Ie, the brainwashing, programming, conditioning, lies, deceit, denial, delusion, etc, just can't get any bigger than this. ------------------------------ Note: What this all means, is that two of the deepest programs, that everyone is (directly and indirectly) brainwashing, programming everyone with, are the beliefs, lies that: 1. “Life is good, death is bad.” And, 2. “Existence is good, non-existence is bad.” Of course, there are many other similar beliefs which people try to brainwash, program everyone with (directly and indirectly), and these beliefs all vary by replacing the word “good” (and “bad”) with some alternate word. Or, the long way to say these beliefs, lies, would, be: A) “Life (and existence) is 35good, precious, special, moral, selfless, acceptable, necessary, etc.” And, B) “Death (and non-existence) is bad, immoral, selfish, unacceptable, etc.” This is a very important subject, and I’ll examine it in more detail, in the long conclusion. -- The reason why I say that “This is a very important subject”, is because almost everything is based on these two lies, deceptions, brainwashing, programming. And, of course, whatever is based on a lie, deception, is also a lie, deception, and therefore, since 99% of life is based on these two lies, deceptions, then it’s to be expected, that 99% of your entire lifetime, will involve suffering (to varying degrees). And, with ever-deeper lies, deceptions, the truth of the situation gets ever-more hidden, and therefore, it becomes ever-harder to stop the cycle-of-suffering. The only way to truly understand this, is to examine just how much is based on these two lies, deceptions, and then keep examining it, with ever-deeper honesty. -- Indeed, most of the “normal” “harmless” thoughts in your own head, are based on these two lies, deceptions. -- Eg, a simple thought, comment like “I want a glass of water”, wouldn't be possible, unless there was an underlying belief, that “Life is good, death is bad”. Indeed, if you believed that “Death is good, life is bad”, then you would want death, and would probably be dead, (and therefore, you would not be able to want a glass of water (because you’re dead)). And, no one would ever consider doing any of the usual things, activities, hobbies in life, (eg: relationships, friendships, family, jobs, having children, etc), unless there was an underlying belief, programming in them, which was that: “Life is good, death is bad”. -------------------- Note: It’s important to realise, that this belief (“Life is good, death is bad”), can be easily brainwashed, programmed into people indirectly. -- Indirect brainwashing, programming, can be infinitely more effective than direct brainwashing, programming, because the person has never heard the fundamental program go into them, yet it’s running their life. -- Ie, it’s a phantom program. I’ll explain the difference, as follows: • Direct brainwashing, programming, is where you brainwash, program a person with that exact belief. -- Ie, in this case, a person is brainwashed, programmed to believe that “Life is good, death is bad”, and this is done by . brainwashing, programming them with the belief “Life is good, death is bad”. 36• Indirect brainwashing, programming, is where you brainwash, program a person with many other beliefs (which require a specific fundamental belief to also exist). -- Ie, in this case, a person is brainwashed, programmed to believe that “Life is good, death is bad”, and this is done by . brainwashing, programming them not with the belief that “Life is good, death is bad”, but with many other beliefs, (which require them to fundamentally believe that “Life is good, death is bad”). And it’s important to see, that almost all beliefs, need this fundamental belief (“Life is good, death is bad”) to exist. Ie, everyone has been indirectly programmed with this belief. And most people are totally oblivious to this fact, and the fact that this very fundamental brainwashing, programming, is running their every decision. -------------------- Side note: Many people talk about how sweatshops are bad. And they also talk about how everyone is bad for buying their clothes from manufacturers who use sweatshops. -- What everyone is missing, is that blaming sweatshops is misdirection. The real people to blame, are the parents who brainwashed, programmed their children (the employees of these sweatshops) with the belief “Life is good, death is bad”. -- Indeed, if this belief had not been brainwashed, programmed into them, then they would not be working in sweatshops. And, if no one in the world had been brainwashed, programmed with this belief, then no one would be working in sweatshops. And therefore, no sweatshops would exist. ---------- The key thing to see, is that: If this belief (“Life is good, death is bad”) is not in you, then if you ever come across anything in life that is unacceptable (eg, suffering that is caused by an unacceptable environment, activity), then you would simply move away from that environment, activity. Note: The reason why I said “simply”, is because you have no fear of moving away from it. Ie, most people don’t move away from suffering, because they have some fear, desire, etc. However, you have no fear, because you know, that if all environments, activities, people are seen to be unacceptable (because they all cause suffering), then you will simply choose to move away from all of them. Moreover, you also know, that if life, existence is seen to be unacceptable (because it causes suffering), then you will simply choose to move away from life, existence. 37Ie, this applies to everything, (all aspects of life, and all levels of life). Ie, the only reason why people put themselves through any suffering (in their job, relationships, friendships, etc), is because they have the fundamental brainwashing, programming in them, that “Life is good, death is bad”. Ie, this is why everyone is suffering. -------------------- So, this leads to an obvious question. Question: Who is responsible for causing this suffering to everyone? Answer: Everyone. Because everyone is constantly brainwashing, programming everyone with all types of things, and all these things are indirectly brainwashing, programming everyone, to believe that “Life is good, death is bad”. So, the situation is, that: Everyone is causing everyone to suffer, and this will continue, until everyone recognises, admits all of this, and stops trying to brainwash, program, use, enslave each other (as personal-slaves, and, or workslaves). And, one of the main things that people brainwash, program their slaves to believe, is that “Suffering is acceptable”. And it’s also important to see, that many people will try to brainwash, program everyone to believe in some lies about the purpose (and meaning) of life, because this will then indirectly brainwash, program people to believe that “Suffering is acceptable”. And, of course, it’s also important to see, that the belief “Suffering is acceptable”, can only exist, if you also believe that “Life is good, death is bad”, and, “Existence is good, nonexistence is bad”. -------------------------------------------------- Note: If you believe that “Suffering is unacceptable”, you will be naturally, inherently unable to have babies, (or use, enslave people as personal-slaves (or work-slaves)), because you just naturally do not want to cause suffering to others. And, a side-effect of being like this, is that you will suffer a lot less, and some suffering in the world will be reduced, prevented, eliminated. And, after you’ve reduced, prevented, eliminated this type of suffering, you’ll then be aware of deeper, subtler levels of existence, and in these deeper, subtler levels, you’ll realise that 38there is suffering (in a subtler form), and so you’ll naturally want to reduce, prevent, eliminate this suffering. Of course, by the time each level (in existence) is truly 100% free from suffering, that level will be non-existent. And therefore, by the time that this is done for all levels, all levels will be non-existent. And then what remains, is non-existence, (“That”). Ie, if a person, society chooses option B, then this belief (that “Suffering is unacceptable”), is not something that is a permanent part of their life, because it is only there as a tool, guide, to totally free them (and everyone) from suffering, and then, when the only thing that remains is “That”, there is no belief, (and no tool, guide, and no person, and no society). And, this is also true for all the other tools, guides in this conclusion, (eg, the tool, guide of ever-deeper honesty). Side note: I’m saying that these things are “guides”, however, it's not really a guide, because it doesn't tell you where to go, or what to do. Instead, it just tells you where not to go, and what not to do. Ie, these guides, (“Suffering is unacceptable” and “ever-deeper honesty”), are tools, guides which do not tell you to go to something. Indeed, they do not tell you to go straight to “That” (non-existence). What happens, is that as you keep using these tools (in everdeeper ways), you realise that everything in existence is malevolent. And then, the only thing that remains, is “That” (non-existence). Ie, these guides, (“Suffering is unacceptable” and “ever-deeper honesty”), are (temporary) tools, guides, which will help you to continuously keep reducing, preventing, eliminating suffering, and get ever-deeper freedom, peace, love, bliss, until all that remains, is “That”. ---------------------------------------- Note: I’m not trying to make everything end up at this outcome (of “That”). I’m just saying, that you need to examine life clearly, honestly (in ever-deeper ways), and then whatever observations, conclusions are found, is what is found. Ie, I did not start from an outcome (which I wanted to get to), and then make up the rest. Ie, the important thing to do, is to: Deliberately use a solid, indisputable, inescapable start-point, because then whatever the outcome, you can’t dispute it, nor escape it. The reason why this is important, is because if you do not do this, then you’ll probably do a clear, honest observation of everything in life, and then realise that you don’t like the results, conclusions, solutions, and so you then go back and fudge the results, (or cover over the results, or constantly misdirect, delude yourself (and other people) away from these results, conclusions, solutions). 39-- This is what everyone is constantly doing, and this is why there is so much suffering in the world. So, what is clear from these previous few paragraphs, is that there are two important things here. Firstly, all of life must be clearly, honestly observed. Ie, the examination is of all aspects of life, and all levels of life. And not one aspect (or level) of life, is missed out. Ie, even the superficial aspects must be examined. I’ll explain why all this is true (and important), in the summary. Secondly, you need to have a solid start-point. This will make sure that you can’t dispute (nor escape from) the observations, conclusions, solutions that you find, and this will make sure that you can’t then delude yourself. And this will then break your cycle-of-suffering. Also, since this start-point is “The neutral, natural, true start-point (for everything)”, then it will not only be able to help break the cycle-of-suffering on an individual level, but also on all levels, (eg: family, community, society, country, planetary, the whole of existence). And, since it is free from opinion and agenda, it will lead to conclusions that are indisputable and inescapable not just for you, but for everyone. I’ll explain this “neutral, natural, true start-point (for everything)” next, in the summary. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Summary Before this book can really start, it's important to establish: The neutral, natural, true start-point (for everything). Before I explain what this is, and how it comes into existence, I need to go through a brief (one page) explanation, of why we need a neutral, natural, true start-point (for everything). -- So the next page is very basic, but necessary. So bear with me. ---------- When people interact with each other, they do so, because they want something, (eg, a thing, feeling, person, etc). There are many weapons, tactics, that they can use to get, control, manipulate that person, (to achieve their desire), but the most common weapon, tactic, is words. -- Ie, they'll use (and, or define, or redefine) words, so that they can: 1. Create, sustain, destroy, various beliefs, ideas, information, etc. 2. Create, sustain, destroy, various rules, systems (whether: legal, moral, social, 40interpersonal, personal, religious, spiritual, etc). This happens at all levels. Eg, even within a small group of people, (eg, friends, relationships, etc), each person will want to try to impose their beliefs, ideas, rules, systems onto everyone, eg, what everyone in that group should believe is: • Good, bad. • Right, wrong. • Moral, immoral. • Acceptable, unacceptable. • Etc. Of course, the only reason why a person, group ever wants these beliefs, ideas, rules, systems to be implemented (and obeyed), are because those beliefs, ideas, rules, systems, will benefit them, (whilst being a disadvantage, to their competitors, enemies), and this will help them get what they're desiring. The potential problem for this book, is that this book wants to reduce, prevent, eliminate suffering, and for a specific type of suffering to be reduced, prevented, eliminated, the true cause of that suffering, has to be exposed, recognised, admitted. The problem then comes, because most people do not like it, when this happens, because it threatens to: 1. Expose some horrible truths to them, (and everyone else). -- Indeed, it's obvious, that a person will not want to hear any truths, if those truths are going to expose to everyone, that that person has been doing many selfish, immoral things, and causing many people to suffer. 2. Burst their bubble, delusions. -- Indeed, it's obvious, that threatening to burst a person's bubble, delusions, is the worst thing for them, because all people spend most of their life, trying to create (and, or maintain), their bubble, delusions, systems. Of course, since people do not want this to happen, they'll do everything in their power, to convince themselves (and other people), that the information (which is a threat to them), is not true. -- There are many ways to do this, and the simplest, is to just keep attacking the information (which is a threat to them), whilst also creating (and sustaining), the beliefs, ideas, rules, systems, that are beneficial to them. Indeed, it just becomes a game, war, where words are the weapons. And, if they're beginning to lose the war, then they'll say things like: • “Your ideas, beliefs, truths, are just subjective.” • “There is no 'truth'.” • “There is no good, bad, right, wrong.” • Etc. 41------------------------------ The key point is, that everyone keeps playing these games, wars, and therefore, suffering keeps happening, (for everyone). Therefore, if this book wants to end all suffering (for everyone), a method needs to be used, which exposes these truths, (ie, the true causes of suffering), and it does so in a way, which people cannot argue against, nor escape from. The only way to do this, is if this book starts from a neutral, natural, true start-point (for everything), and then continues in an objective, rational, logical way. And part of this process, will be to define words, in a neutral, natural, true way. And what this means, is that the definition of the words (used in this book), will be fair, equal. (Actually the words will be beyond fair, equal.) -- And therefore, all subsequent statements and conclusions (that are based on those words), are fair, equal, to everyone. So, let's begin. ---------------------------------------- A neutral, natural, true start-point (for everything), is something that is “true” (for everyone). -- And the only way to get something that is true (for everyone), is if you have something that is “real” (for everyone). One thing that is real (for everyone), is that: Suffering is real, (or as good as real). -- Therefore, the neutral, natural, true start-point (for everything), is: Suffering is real, (or as good as real). Of course, this must be provable. -- However, proof is not enough, because what is also important, is that this proof is: 1. Practical, tangible, real, (and not just some theoretical, academic, scientific, religious, spiritual, philosophical nonsense). 2. Able to be done by everyone. -- Ie, this is not a proof, which is done in an experimental laboratory, by only a few people in the world, and everyone else has to accept their findings, proof, and believe that they're not lying, misdirecting you, (or that they themselves, have been fooled, tricked). 3. Able to be recreated, as many times as you need. -- Ie, it's not just something that can be proven on some occasions, but it doesn't work on other occasions. 42Note: This proof does not really need to be done (in practice), because it's something that is so obvious. However, there are always some people, who want to argue against it (so that they can create selfish, immoral, unfair, unequal rules (and systems, beliefs), whether: legal, moral, social, interpersonal, personal, religious, spiritual, etc. So, if these people need this to be demonstrated, proved to them, then (as long as they consent to it), this can be demonstrated (and proved) to them, in the following way: To demonstrate (and prove) to them, that “Suffering is real, (or as good as real)”, all that you need to do, is to (directly or indirectly) cause pain, suffering to them, (which can be a combination of physical, mental, emotional, spiritual, pain, suffering), and then keep increasing this pain, suffering, until it's far beyond their pain, suffering threshold. At this point, they will then admit that: 1. Suffering is real, (or as good as real). 2. Suffering is unwanted. -- Ie, they want the pain, suffering to be reduced, prevented, eliminated. 3. Freedom is wanted. -- Ie, they want the freedom, to be able to leave this situation (of intolerable pain, suffering), in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way. -- And, if they can't leave this situation (of intolerable pain, suffering), then they want the freedom, to be able to leave life, existence, in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way. (I'll explain this in more detail, in the long conclusion.) Ie, this proves that, “Suffering is real, (or as good as real)”, and from this neutral, natural, true start-point (for everything), everything can start, because we now have something that is “real”, and “true”. ---------- Moreover, because we've now proved that, “suffering is unwanted”, we can now say that: Any pain, suffering that is inflicted (directly or indirectly) onto a person, is non-consensual, (unless they actually asked for this to be done to them). So, from here, we can now define all other words, (eg: “immoral”, “bad”, “wrong”, etc). -- Ie, since we now know, that pain, suffering is real (or as good as real), and that it's not wanted by anyone, it can therefore be said, that: A person that creates, perpetuates, increases (unwanted, non-consensual) 43suffering, (directly or indirectly, via their action or inaction) to another person, is doing something that is immoral, bad, and wrong. And, if this is done with high intensity, (or with low intensity over a long period of time), then it can be called “cruel”, and with even more intensity (or time), it can be called “evil”. Ie, these words have been defined, from this neutral, natural, true start-point (for everything). -- Ie, the definition of these words, are without agenda. And, therefore, they are fair, equal, to everyone. -- And therefore, any sentences that I create using these words, are also going to be fair, equal, to everyone. Ie, this is the opposite of what most people do, which is to define, use such words, to attack other people, (and, or to make themselves look good), and, or to create unfair beliefs, rules, systems, laws, (or for whatever other selfish, immoral motives that they have). Note: The issue of truth, words, and definitions, (and the dimensions, realms that are beyond all words and truths), will all be discussed in more detail, in the long conclusion. ---------------------------------------- So, lets now take this one step further. Earlier on, I mentioned that the person who is feeling pain, suffering that is far beyond their pain, suffering threshold, will admit that: 1. Suffering is real, (or as good as real). 2. Suffering is unwanted. -- Ie, they want the pain, suffering to be reduced, prevented, eliminated. 3. Freedom is wanted. -- Ie, they want the freedom, to be able to leave this situation (of intolerable pain, suffering), in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way. -- And, if they can't leave this situation (of intolerable pain, suffering), then they want the freedom, to be able to leave life, existence, in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way. What is also important to see, is that immediately after point 3, they will then also admit that: 4. If they want to move away from pain, suffering, and this freedom is not provided (in an instant, painless, effortless, guaranteed, permanent way), then their situation, life, is prison, torture, slavery, rape. 5. Any people, society, systems, governments, laws, rules, etc, which force 44people into (and keep them in), a situation, life which is prison, torture, slavery, rape, are inherently selfish, immoral, cruel, evil. 6. There is no middle ground, because the freedom (to move away from suffering), either exists, or it doesn’t. 7. Since there is no middle ground, there is no room for discussion, debate, conversation, etc. 8. If the right to move away from suffering, does not exist, then this inherently means, that it's ok to imprison, torture, enslave, rape people. -- And this inherently means, that the society, systems, governments, laws, rules, people, etc, are: • Pro-torture. • Pro-rape. • Pro-enslavement. • Pro-false-imprisonment. ---------------------------------------- And, as they go deeper into all of this, it is also realised, that the category of evil, needs to be split into two sections: • Evil = A person that does an evil act, to a person, entity. • Ultimate evil = A person that does an evil act, to a person, entity, that they themselves created. Ie, making someone suffer (long-term) is evil, but creating them, and then making them suffer (long-term), is obviously infinitely more evil, (because it's evil, on top of evil). Note: The term “ultimate evil” sounds a bit extreme, and therefore, it would have been better to use some other term, however, there is no other term. -- However, it’s important to remember, that this term is just a natural result of the neutral, natural, true start-point (for everything). Ie, from this start-point, the term evil was derived, and then it was realised, that there is such a big difference between the two categories of evil, that this difference must be evident in the terminology used. Therefore, since this evil is infinitely more evil (than the other category), the term “ultimate”, is correct. And, the deeper you examine this at all levels, the more you realise, that there’s another reason why “ultimate evil” is a fair, reasonable, logical term, and technically speaking, it’s the correct (and ideal) term to use. The reason why this is the ideal word, terminology, is because the people who create new people, entities, are responsible for all the suffering in existence, and therefore, they are actually (by definition) the ultimate, highest of evil. This is obvious, because if people, entities did not keep creating new people, entities, then existence would end, and then there would be zero suffering and ultimate freedom, peace, love, bliss in (as) “That”, (non-existence). 45-------------------------------------------------- There is another key thing that I want to mention in this summary, but before I can discuss it, I need to reiterate some points. So bear with me, for this next page. This book will provide a method, of how to: 1. Permanently reduce, prevent, eliminate suffering. And, 2. Get ever-deeper freedom, peace, love, bliss. And, 3. Get “That”. The method of how to get these three things, (in points 1 to 3), will be applicable to all people, entities, beings, and also to all dimensions, reams in existence, and existence itself. Note: In this book, when I use the word suffering, I mean unwanted non-consensual suffering, (whether: physical, emotional, mental, spiritual, etc). -------------------- Since everyone's actions (at a fundamental level), are based on one of these three things, (mentioned in points 1 to 3 (above)), this therefore means, that there is a fundamental: 1. Ever-deeper desire, which is applicable to all people, entities, beings. -- Ie, although people have different superficial desires, these desires are all based on the same fundamental desires, which everyone has. -- This book will explain these desires, which exist: a) In all aspects of life, (and in life, existence itself). b) At all levels of life, (from superficial to fundamental). 2. Cause of all suffering, (for all people, entities, beings, and existence itself). -- This book will explain the causes of all suffering: a) In all aspects of life, (and in life, existence itself). b) At all levels of life, (from superficial to fundamental). 3. Solution to all suffering, (for all people, entities, beings, and existence itself). -- This book will explain how to permanently reduce, prevent, eliminate suffering: a) In all aspects of life, (and in life, existence itself). b) At all levels of life, (from superficial to fundamental). 4. Realisation, conclusion of the meaning (and purpose) of all the different aspects of life, (and life, existence itself). And this is applicable, at all levels. -- This will be covered in the long conclusion. ------------------------------

André Cancian, O Vazio da Máquina: Niilismo e outros abismos , 2009 - Citas Antinatalistas

La materia inanimada, siendo puramente objetiva, es ajena a los fenómenos subjetivos que atormentan a los seres vivos, es decir, libre de todo sufrimiento, en un estado de perfecta serenidad. No tiene sentido tratar de ser "mezquino" con la materia inanimada. No hay forma de torturar rocas arrojándolas por acantilados, martillándolas, etc. Sólo hay una forma de hacer sufrir a la materia: transformándola en un ser vivo. De ello se desprende que, incluso desde un punto de vista objetivo, podemos encontrar implicaciones morales en la reproducción, ya que condena a la materia a sufrir innecesariamente en forma de ser vivo impulsado por aflicciones y necesidades, para luego volver a la misma situación en la que inicialmente se encontró a sí mismo, sin ningún significado o beneficio para él. Desde esta perspectiva, no afirmamos que la reproducción sea incorrecta, solo que es cruel. Afirmamos que, objetivamente, vivir es sufrir. Sin embargo, no sacamos conclusiones subjetivas de esto. Si vale la pena vivir o no es una cuestión diferente y subjetiva, que se refiere al valor que le damos a la vida. La inmoralidad radica en el hecho de que el valor de la vida es un tema que solo puede ser considerado por quienes ya están vivos. Cuando nos reproducimos, imponemos nuestras conclusiones personales a alguien que ni siquiera puede defenderse. Naturalmente, no es una moral trascendental y absoluta, sino relativa a la vida. Puede entenderse como objetivo en el sentido de referirse a algo que necesariamente ocurre, por la propia naturaleza de la vida, por las condiciones impuestas a la existencia subjetiva cuando se inserta en las determinaciones del mundo objetivo. Por lo tanto, No confundamos esta observación con la predicación moral sobre el bien y el mal, el bien y el deber, etc. Solo nos preocupamos por describir objetivamente las consecuencias físicas del fenómeno igualmente físico de traer a la existencia una nueva conciencia que será atormentada por la inquietud que provoca. mueve la vida.

En esta perspectiva, la reproducción nos convierte en los únicos responsables de crear sufrimiento en el mundo. Sin nosotros, no habría dolor. Pero la hay, y es culpa nuestra. Objetivamente, el dolor no es algo malo, pero lo es subjetivamente. Nosotros, como seres vivos, tenemos el dolor como punto de referencia supremo para todo lo indeseable. Nuestra naturaleza objetiva y biológica nos impone esta condición. Así como el placer es bueno, el dolor es malo, ya sea físico, emocional o psicológico. Dejemos que los relativistas se pongan de pie, con sus locas teorías sobre la “arbitrariedad” del tema: nos gustaría verlos creer esto mientras les insertamos púas debajo de las uñas. La presencia del dolor como algo positivamente indeseable es un requisito imprescindible para que la vida sea sostenible, es una condición impuesta objetivamente a las máquinas de supervivencia que somos. El dolor nos convierte en organismos eficientes, y sin él no funcionaríamos correctamente, simplemente moriríamos sin dolor por ignorar los peligros que nos rodean. Esto quiere decir que cuando hacemos surgir de la nada todo el dolor que existe en la tierra, cuando ponemos la materia en la única condición en la que puede sufrir, es decir, cuando la transformamos en un ser vivo, nos volvemos positivamente malos, responsables. para la diseminación del sufrimiento. Así, la reproducción intencional nos convierte en seres perversos e inmorales, y esto en un sentido puramente objetivo, porque es un juicio universalmente válido, sean cuales sean las circunstancias en las que nos encontremos. Mientras exista dolor, mientras la vida implique sufrimiento, el acto de reproducir significa colaborar con su crecimiento, perpetuando esta desgracia, esforzándome activamente por hacer del mundo un lugar más doloroso y lamentable.

Obviamente, tenemos la libertad de ser tan malos y egoístas como queramos, pero no podemos negar que somos culpables de esto, no hay forma de ser inocentes de esta acusación. Originalmente, esa vida no existió, nunca existió, y habría continuado así, si tan solo no tuviéramos la admirable idea de eyacular en un útero y hacerlo aparecer de la nada y luego afirmar que su sufrimiento "es" no es nuestro problema ", que no somos responsables porque es" natural ". Ahora bien, ni siquiera un teólogo podría tomarse en serio una excusa tan poco convincente. La objeción de que esto no necesariamente nos hace malos porque el sufrimiento ocurre en la vida de forma natural e inevitable no se justifica porque, aunque no podemos cambiar su constitución íntima, tenemos la opción de reproducirnos o no. El que nace, por el contrario, no tiene elección, como no lo hicimos nosotros. Puede que tengamos hijos o no. Sin embargo, cuando decidimos tenerlos, la elección nos vuelve positivamente malos, gratuitamente crueles. Nosotros, como un insomnio de la materia, dañamos lo que duerme profundamente solo para compartir nuestra falta de sueño, para sentirnos menos aburridos con nuestras existencias vergonzosamente inútiles.

Sin duda, el impulso reproductivo tiene profundas raíces biológicas, pero eso tampoco nos libera de la culpa. Por supuesto, no fuimos nosotros quienes inventamos la vida y sus reglas, sino que fuimos nosotros quienes la propagamos. Creamos intencionalmente una vida en circunstancias en las que sabíamos que el sufrimiento sería inevitable. El impulso de la agresión a menudo nos lleva a cometer delitos, pero no dejamos de considerarlo reprobable. Es algo igualmente instintivo y natural, arraigado en nosotros tan profundamente como el impulso sexual. La diferencia es que nuestra agresión se materializará nueve meses después, como si pusiéramos una bomba de tiempo en el corazón de la nada.

La situación que tenemos es básicamente la siguiente: un individuo inflige deliberadamente un gran sufrimiento físico, emocional y psicológico a otro con la esperanza de disminuir el suyo, y la víctima nunca podrá defenderse de tal agresión, excepto mediante el suicidio. Lógicamente, el dolor no será provocado directamente por nosotros, sino por las circunstancias en las que colocamos al individuo. Sin embargo, esto podría haberse evitado con cualquier condón barato. Causar un gran dolor a una persona inocente, solo para lograr una pequeña reducción del nuestro, es un acto vil y repugnante. Sin duda alguna, podríamos sentirnos autorizados a reclamar reparación por tal injusticia, por haber sido colocados en esta indigna y degradante situación. Tendría sentido recibir una compensación por las molestias de nacer, pero esto es algo que, como se dijo, la naturaleza ya ha provisto sabiamente en forma de instinto para proteger a la descendencia. El amor paterno es la indemnización que los hijos reciben de sus padres por haberlos colocado en el mundo.

Cuando renunciamos a tener hijos, renunciamos a una pequeña y dudosa satisfacción personal para evitar que surja un gran sufrimiento. Si podemos ejercer un mínimo de compasión por lo que, según nosotros mismos, será el único objeto de nuestro amor y dedicación, veremos que, al no reproducirnos, estaremos poniendo en práctica la única bondad posible hacia nuestros hijos. Consolémonos saber que, porque no nacieron, en nuestros sueños siempre estarán durmiendo en sus habitaciones, bajo mantas tan suaves como el abrazo de aquel cuyo amor nunca les permitiría sufrir, y así los protegió de existencia. Permanecen cómodos, serenos, en paz, con una media sonrisa en los labios por no haber probado nunca la amargura y la desilusión de la vida. Siempre permanecerán puros, eternamente libres de los peligros del mundo. Este es el verdadero significado de entregar la vida a favor de los hijos.

Fuente: (PDF) O Vazio da Máquina - Niilismo e outros abismos | André Cancian - Academia.edu

https://www.academia.edu/41872748/O_Vazio_da_M%C3%A1quina_-_Niilismo_e_outros_abismos

Antinatalism - Wikiquote: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Antinatalism

CITAS ANTINATALISTAS DE JULIO CABRERA

Cuando alguien (incluidos los filósofos) defiende la belleza pretenciosa de "tener hijos", se refiere al placer de "verlos crecer", primero niños, luego adolescentes, luego graduados y adultos independientes (esto ocurre no solo en las clases pudientes sino también, en parte, en los más modestos). Sin embargo, es extraño que, cuando hablan de niños, se detengan inexplicablemente en este punto y nunca se refieran a su declive, a su envejecimiento, a su decadencia, quizás porque piensan que no estarán allí para contemplar este declive. Los padres prefieren no ver el final de este proceso, como si el niño se desvaneciera en el aire. Se omite el aspecto residual de la paternidad; el niño solo se visualiza floreciendo. A la muerte del residuo infantil se le niega toda visibilidad. La consumación de los procesos se disimula como algo sucio e indecente, no digno de mostrarse.

Matar a alguien y dar a luz a alguien son dos acciones violentas a través de las cuales, mágicamente, el hombre intenta ponerse en el lugar de Dios. La víctima de un homicidio siempre está indefensa, pero nunca tan indefensa como la víctima de un parto. El parto derrama tanta sangre inocente como un homicidio. Si la procreación es una elección libre, entonces la vida es un dolor fundamentalmente innecesario.

Las enfermedades suelen aparecer ante nosotros como algo inesperado, debido al llamado estado "predeterminado" de buena salud. La dificultad de medir la salud está en que la mayoría de los indicadores existentes son negativos, es decir, sirven para medir la ausencia de salud. La buena salud, por el contrario, puede verse como una anomalía accidental, no como un atributo intrínseco, y menos aún, como un "derecho" de los humanos. Ante una enfermedad, lo que habitualmente llamamos "vida" es un esfuerzo por sobrevivir, "resistir", "mantenerse", "perseverar", "aguantar". La cuestión ética fundamental consiste en que, como potenciales creadores de la vida de otro ser humano, no podemos hacer predicciones sobre los mecanismos de supervivencia del posible ser, su vulnerabilidad al dolor estructural. No tenemos ningún derecho moral a hacer una predicción estandarizada sobre esta vulnerabilidad. La siniestra felicidad (siniestra y superficial) con la que nuestra sociedad acoge el embarazo y el nacimiento, debe necesariamente confrontar sus propias categorías éticas, si somos profundos en nuestra reflexión.

Nuestra organización social asegura acríticamente la moralidad de la paternidad, y la procreación se presenta como un valor naturalmente positivo. Por el contrario, cualquier problematización de estos valores se considerará demoníaca. Pero la situación reflexiva es perfectamente clara: o abandonamos el valor de "evitar el dolor inútil" o problematizamos la moral acrítica de la procreación. Si la reflexión moral ha de ser racional, buscar la verdad, etc., tiene que afrontar esta alternativa.

Si la libertad, según la propia moral tradicional, es un valor ético fundamental, la base misma de la ética, hay que ser consciente de que la creación de un niño puede ser la primera gran falta de respeto a la libertad de la persona humana. La cuestión de la libertad adolece aquí del mismo problema que la cuestión del dolor: es una cuestión de valor ético que la ética afirmativa tradicional no puede radicalizar.

A la luz de la ontología natural, no es correcto el argumento de que no sabemos nada sobre nuestros posibles descendientes, por ejemplo, sobre la capacidad que tendrán para superar el dolor estructural; porque incluso nosotros no sabemos, por ejemplo, si disfrutarán viajando, trabajando o estudiando lenguas clásicas, sí sabemos que serán seres indigentes, decadentes, desocupantes que comenzarán a morir desde el nacimiento, que enfrentarán y se caracterizarán por disfunciones sistemáticas. , que tendrán que constituirse en su propio ser como seres-contra-los-otros -en el sentido de lidiar con la agresividad y tener que descargarla sobre los demás-, que perderán a los que aman y serán perdidos por aquellos que los aman, y el tiempo tomará todo lo que logren construir.

Indudablemente no justificaríamos moralmente el comportamiento de alguien que envió a un colega a una situación peligrosa diciendo: "Yo lo envié allí porque sé que es fuerte y se las arreglará bien". Las "fortalezas" del recién nacido no alivian en nada la responsabilidad moral del procreador. Cualquiera respondería: "Esto es irrelevante. Tu papel en el asunto consistió en enviar a la gente a una situación que sabes que era difícil y dolorosa y la podías evitar. Tus predicciones sobre sus modales de reacción no disminuyen en nada tu responsabilidad". En el caso de la procreación, el razonamiento podría ser el mismo, y de forma notoriamente enfática, ya que en cualquier situación intramundana con personas ya existentes en la que enviamos a alguien a una posición conocida como dolorosa,el otro siempre podría huir del dolor en la medida en que su ser ya esté en el mundo y pueda predecir el peligro y tratar de evitar estar expuesto a una maniobra despreciativa y manipuladora. En el caso del que está naciendo, por el contrario, esto no es posible en absoluto porque es precisamente su propio ser el que se fabrica y utiliza. Por lo que respecta al nacimiento, la manipulación parece ser total.

Así, quien haya dicho procrear por amor, como otros matan por odio, podría haber dicho una verdad, pero, sin duda, esta persona no ha dado ninguna justificación moral para la procreación. Decir que has tenido un hijo "por amor" es una forma de decir que lo has tenido compulsivamente, según los ritmos salvajes de la vida. De manera similar, podríamos amar intensamente a nuestros padres y, al mismo tiempo, considerar la paternidad éticamente-racionalmente problemática y visualizar que hemos sido manipulados por ellos. Puedo seguir amando después de haber detectado la inmoralidad, no hay nada contradictorio en eso. Tampoco justificaría moralmente un homicidio diciendo que lo hemos hecho por odio, ni un suicidio diciendo que lo hemos hecho "por odio contra nosotros mismos". Algo puede seguir siendo éticamente problemático incluso cuando está guiado por el amor.

La gente proclama que "la experiencia de la paternidad es extraordinaria" y se la recomienda a todos (y denigra a quienes no la han pasado). Pero podemos preguntarnos: "¿Extraordinario para quién?" Sin duda es extraordinario para los padres. Cuando dicen que no solo estarán felices y satisfechos con la experiencia sino también con sus hijos, no se dan cuenta de la inmensa asimetría y desajuste entre estas dos experiencias, la experiencia de crear y de ser creados. El niño creado se ve obligado a aceptar la experiencia, a hacerla buena e interesante (e incluso extraordinaria); ¿qué otra opción tendrían? Esta obligación no está presente en los padres, donde la naturaleza "extraordinaria" de la experiencia es parte de un proyecto atractivo y unilateral. Las situaciones de ambas partes no son comparables. Así, cuando algunos responden: "No tiene sentido que quieras demostrar que la vida es mala; usted no puede decidir por su hijo; tal vez les guste vivir", ¿qué significa eso? ¡Por supuesto, en cierto sentido, están obligados a gustar la vida! Pero este "gusto" siempre será una aceptación desesperada. El niño creado no está en una posición de realmente gustar de la vida. Les podría gustar si realmente hubieran elegido nacer. Ante los hechos consumados, se ven obligados a aferrarse desesperadamente a la vida. O les "gusta" o serán destruidos (por una enfermedad mental, o por la hostilidad de los demás).

Los filósofos siempre han hablado de la vida como una "preparación para la muerte" y de la filosofía como un "aprender a morir". Pero hay una sabiduría anterior a eso: aprender a abstenerse; no poner a nadie en la situación de tener que aprender a morir.

MV dice que el rechazo a la vida aparece en estados posteriores, pero que en el momento del nacimiento, y ya antes, todo es aceptación de la vida. Pero, ¿esto es así? ¿Qué se puede decir del clamor con el que nacen los niños, del llanto primordial, del primer contacto traumático (estudiado por Freud) con el mundo? ¿No es ya el clamor del niño su primera opinión filosófica sobre el mundo? ¿Por qué no nace riendo, o al menos tranquilo? Cuando el bebé es arrojado al mundo en el momento del parto, su primera reacción es pesimista, una protesta contra el desprecio y la perturbación, un grito inicial que no tuvo que aprender, ya que tendrá que aprender a reír en las primeras semanas o incluso meses de vida (que ya marca, en el acto mismo inaugural del ser, la asimetría pesimista: el bebé aprende a reír, pero nace llorando); nace el bebé, forzado por los deseos ajenos, en una desesperación inicial, en un llanto de impotencia hondo y abismal, en un terror primordial que, de inmediato, mediante movimientos, caricias, consuelos, etc., los adultos intentarán suavizar; movimientos que se repetirán a lo largo de su vida: desesperación inicial seguida de comodidades protectoras; pero las comodidades son posteriores a la desesperación; la desesperación es lo primero y las comodidades son las reacciones. No están al mismo nivel. ¡Asimetría!

Los niños pequeños continúan llorando mucho durante varios años; lloran y lloran sin cesar; pueden molestarnos a menudo, pero tienen razón y tenemos que conmovernos por sus gritos y aceptar que son una reacción perfectamente justa a lo que se les ha hecho; algunos lloran hasta edades muy avanzadas, hasta encontrar otras formas de protesta y manifestación del sufrimiento; incluso de adultos, seguimos llorando de diversas formas.

El padre sabe perfectamente bien que está dando un producto de dudosa calidad sólo para su propio logro y felicidad; al admitir que la persona puede querer devolverlo, ellos mismos comprenden completamente la naturaleza dudosa del obsequio.

Lamentar tener que morir debería ser estructuralmente idéntico a lamentar haber nacido, porque no está en nuestro poder nacer de una manera no mortal.
Lo mejor hubiera sido no nacer. No nacer es, en una ética negativa, el bien absoluto; pero es, precisamente, el bien lo que no se puede buscar. (Atención: la situación es más radical que en el caso de bienes que se pueden buscar pero nunca se consiguen; no nacer ni siquiera se puede buscar).

La gente habla de la "maravillosa experiencia de la paternidad". ¿Alguna vez te has preguntado por qué es tan maravilloso? Puede ser maravilloso porque es muy manipulador; manipular da mucho placer, porque tienes una persona en tus manos. Cuando el niño es pequeño lo llevas como quieras, peina como quieras, corta el pelo, ponlo sobre la mesa, como lo he visto con frecuencia. Los adultos juegan con el niño, personas que no tendrían tema de conversación o interacción, cuando sus vidas grises, vacías e insignificantes saldrían a la luz, el niño los salva.

La tradición moral dice: tenemos muchas tendencias naturales, pero como seres humanos éticos tenemos que tratar de superar los impulsos naturales. Por ejemplo, somos violentos por naturaleza; Los seres humanos son por naturaleza muy egoístas, tratan de enfocar sus decisiones en sí mismos, pero la ética siempre dice: hay que luchar contra estas tendencias naturales. No puedes ser todo lo violento que manda la naturaleza, no puedes ser todo lo egoísta que la naturaleza pide. Entonces, si me dices que la procreación es natural, ser natural no demuestra que sea moral. Por el contrario, filósofos brasileños olvidados como Tobias Barreto expresaron exactamente lo contrario. Tobias Barreto pensó que cuando algo es natural está mal y hay que combatirlo. (La esclavitud de un pueblo sobre otros es natural, pero es cultural que la esclavitud no debe existir.) Entonces no me digas que la procreación es natural y por eso tenemos que hacerlo. Toda la moralidad humana es antinatural; toda la moralidad humana es artificial, así como nuestros sistemas de alimentación en nuestros sofisticados restaurantes también son artificiales y antinaturales. ¿Qué animal come como nosotros? Incluso nuestra sexualidad es artificial; no es puramente instintivo, sino en gran parte simbólico. Si tuvieras ese argumento en la manga, aún tendrías que demostrar que lo que proviene de la naturaleza es moral, porque hay muchos argumentos que muestran que lo que proviene de la naturaleza puede ser opuesto a la moralidad.

Por supuesto, la posibilidad de que el recién nacido no tenga la fuerza para soportar la lucha de la vida es solo una posibilidad, no una necesidad. Sin embargo, la cuestión es que su mera posibilidad es suficiente para la imputación moral. No existen fuertes relaciones causales entre los métodos de educación y la crianza de los niños para dar forma a sus destinos en la vida. Como dicen, un niño es "una lotería". Las precauciones que toman los progenitores para evitar ciertos riesgos para sus hijos podrían ser precisamente las que los expongan a un mayor peligro. Las muchas vidas humanas que terminan catastróficamente parecen ilustrar el altísimo precio que se debe pagar en un intento de justificar éticamente la "apuesta" de la procreación, incluso si la realiza de la manera más seria el procreador sensible. Sin embargo, es importante que incluso cuando no ocurra ninguna de estas catástrofes, el éxito del recién nacido en la vida no exime a los progenitores de la responsabilidad moral de haberlo puesto en riesgo de ser víctima de una de estas calamidades. Además, incluso para el niño que ha "ganado" la apuesta, su "éxito" permanecerá para siempre e indefinidamente conectado a la naturaleza unilateral del acto procreador. Se habrá ganado la apuesta, pero esta nunca será la propia apuesta del niño. El recién nacido puede tener suerte y "ganar la apuesta", pero nunca estuvo en condiciones de negarse a participar en la competición.

Es muy curioso que a veces se considere cruel o inhumano plantear el tema de la ética de la procreación, como si esto mostrara un rechazo a los niños por nacer, una especie de odio por sus vidas. Se trata de una deformación total de las intenciones de una reflexión ética sobre la procreación. Por el contrario, esta reflexión está motivada por una profunda preocupación por los posibles hijos, por el riesgo de que su emergencia sea consecuencia de un acto desconsiderado, coactivo y agresivo hacia pequeños seres indefensos, sobre los que se cree tener pleno derecho a planificar. todo sobre sus vidas para nuestro pleno deseo y satisfacción. Gran parte de la revuelta que despierta en el mundo adulto por la simple mención de este tema indica que los padres obtienen un gran placer en el acto procreador, y reaccionar —a veces con enojo— contra quienes cuestionan esta poderosa fuente de placer y, en consecuencia, el inmenso poder sobre el que va a nacer. Este poder total sobre otra vida es intensamente seductor y nadie quiere renunciar a él. Pero en la reflexión ética, sea cual sea el tema, Nunca se trata de evaluar solo la satisfacción que obtenemos de nuestras acciones, sino de ponderar si lo que hacemos está bien o no, si el poder que podemos acumular sobre seres más indefensos está o no éticamente justificado.
Lo más curioso es que los humanos de clases más pobres suelen ser los que cultivan una adoración ilimitada por su madre por haberlos criado con tantos sacrificios. Sufren todo tipo de miseria, pobreza extrema, enfermedad, delincuencia, discriminación, exclusión y tortura, sin darse cuenta nunca de que fueron sus padres quienes los pusieron en esa situación por su propio placer o por un descuido irresponsable. Y cuando el niño comete algún acto dañino impulsado por la desesperación en la que fue puesto, la gente aún simpatiza con la "pobre madre" por tener un hijo que es "tan ingrato". ¡Toda la miseria heredada se convierte mágicamente en responsabilidad del niño! El mismo esquema argumentativo que aquí se aplica, también se aplica en las teodias: el Padre impecable creó a su hijo por amor, les dio algo muy valioso, y también los hizo "libres", mientras que el niño, siendo libre, pecó, se portó mal y profanó esta cosa tan valiosa que se les dio, causando insatisfacción a su desafortunado padre. Es un esquema casi tragicómico, porque es exactamente lo contrario que parece ser cierto: nuestros padres nos dieron, para su propio placer y beneficio, algo de valor muy dudoso que nosotros, como resultado de la sujeción y la necesidad, es decir, muy lejos de cualquier "libertad" real - tenemos que intentar mejorar con mucho esfuerzo. Mientras no revertimos esta valoración imperante en nuestras sociedades, las cuestiones éticas no pueden ni siquiera empezar a ser consideradas seriamente, porque la madre 'La relación visceralmente egocéntrica y manipuladora con sus hijos seguirá siendo considerada como un paradigma de moralidad ética, lo que parece, al menos, un error crucial de apreciación, una mitología gravísima, una mistificación colosal.
La "gratitud eterna" está presente no solo en las primeras etapas de la vida, sino a lo largo de la larga dependencia de los niños de sus padres durante los primeros diez años de vida -en los que incluso son objetos de exhibición- y en el duro período de la adolescencia, en qué niños son tratados sin cesar como "ingratos", como si nunca hubieran podido pagar su inmensa deuda; todo lo que se compra para ellos, para su futuro, sus estudios, todas esas cosas que el niño nunca pidió, que son parte de una inversión afectiva y económica de los padres, se presenta sin fin y por largos y duros años, como prueba de El sacrificio y el amor, como objeto de eterna gratitud, nunca retribuidos del todo por los hijos ingratos. El tema de la paternidad constituye un poderoso mecanismo de poder en el que incluso la violencia física de los castigos y golpizas se justifica a favor de la elevación nunca solicitada de los arrojados al mundo, tratando de construir protecciones para que no sean destruidos por los inmensos. regalo recibido.

El sufrimiento es algo que está, pura y simplemente, conectado con el "ser". Algo no se puede "poner en funcionamiento" sin dolor. Así, el dolor no es una maldición, ni un castigo, ni una anomalía, ni un desajuste, ni una desviación, sino la conditio sine qua non del ser. Ser es una condición necesaria del sufrimiento. La ética afirmativa, en la medida en que respete el valor de la coherencia, no debe proclamar la eliminación del dolor como su preocupación.

¿Un agente genuinamente racional elegiría nacer? Mi argumento contra RM Hare se puede releer en la "Crítica de la moral afirmativa" (...). Allí sugiero que en el experimento donde se consulta mágicamente al no-ser sobre su posible nacimiento, Hare se equivoca al asumir acríticamente que "ellos" sin duda elegirían nacer. (Ésta es la tendencia afirmativa habitual). Supongamos que estamos hablando de un ser humano, es decir, una criatura racional capaz de ponderar las razones. La información que se le da a este posible ser en el experimento de Hare es incompleta y sesgada. También debemos decirles que si nacen, no tendrán garantía de nacer sin problemas; que si logran nacer sin problemas, seguramente sufrirán muchos males intramundanos; que si logran evitarlos (y esto es posible en el intramundo, aunque sea difícil), no podemos darles ninguna garantía sobre la duración de su vida ni sobre el tipo de muerte que tendrán, y también tendrán sufrir la muerte de quienes llegan a amar y su muerte la sufrirán quienes los amen (si tienen la suerte de amar a alguien y ser amados por alguien, lo cual tampoco está garantizado). Hay que decirles que si logran evitar una muerte accidental violenta, en unos años se deteriorarán (al igual que las personas que aman y quieren), y que tienen una alta probabilidad de convertirse en un paciente terminal que podría sufrir. terriblemente hasta el momento de su desaparición. Si aún es posible que el no ser, después de haber asimilado toda esta información, elija nacer, ¿No podríamos albergar dudas fundadas sobre su calidad como "agente racional"?

Dada la contingencia de nuestro nacimiento, todo dolor es inútil. El dolor inútil es insoportable. Ergo, el nacimiento en sí es insoportable. En este sentido, tener hijos es inmoral. Tener hijos tiene un peso moral, una problematización: no es, como suele pensar la ética afirmativa, un hecho puro, inocente y que no requiere una opinión crítica. La ética afirmativa está dispuesta a sostener la inmoralidad de la totalidad del mundo única y exclusivamente para salvar la moral de su origen. La ética negativa sugiere lo contrario, el rescate de la moralidad del mundo tras el descubrimiento de la inmoralidad de su origen (y el problema mismo de las teodias se invierte: ¿cómo es compatible la inocencia del mundo con la maldad divina?).

Fuente: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Antinatalism
Traducido a español con google translate y retocado usando mi lógica cuando creo que lo que dice no tiene mucha lógica, en una frase cambié "nacer" por "tener hijos" ya que de otro modo parecía que el culpable era el hijo por nacer y no los padres por hacerlo nacer.


Concretamente en la última frase.


Tanto el traductor automático del navegador bing como google translate, tanto traduciendo la frase desde el inglés o desde el portugués, siempre lo traduce así:


...El dolor inútil es insoportable. Ergo, nacer es insoportable. En ese sentido, nacer es inmoral. Nacer tiene un peso moral, un cuestionamiento...




--


Creo que es demasiado obvio que en nuestro idioma, eso no tiene lógica, "En ese sentido, nacer es inmoral. Nacer tiene un peso moral," obviamente se ha de cambiar nacer por hacer nacer o por procrear o por engendrar o por tener hijos, ya que el que nace no tiene culpa, es obligado a nacer, por lo tanto nacer no es inmoral ni tiene peso moral. El peso de la culpa recae en quien hace nacer, no en quien nace, obvio.